summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-10-10 22:33:17 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-10-10 22:33:17 +0000
commitbecb92dec85924969ac0c3b049e0a74def431453 (patch)
tree747fe6a7cb5c4e17f630e94e65bf22f650170a47 /clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
parent0dfdb44797fa2ce4273e38f13403b62a5ce0a9b0 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-becb92dec85924969ac0c3b049e0a74def431453.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-becb92dec85924969ac0c3b049e0a74def431453.zip
[Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module ("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule. This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308 respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been added in r315366. llvm-svn: 315379
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 1ce57e56c38..46cda5e9ac7 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static void maybeDiagnoseTemplateParameterShadow(Sema &SemaRef, Scope *S,
SourceLocation Loc,
IdentifierInfo *Name) {
NamedDecl *PrevDecl = SemaRef.LookupSingleName(
- S, Name, Loc, Sema::LookupOrdinaryName, Sema::ForRedeclaration);
+ S, Name, Loc, Sema::LookupOrdinaryName, Sema::ForVisibleRedeclaration);
if (PrevDecl && PrevDecl->isTemplateParameter())
SemaRef.DiagnoseTemplateParameterShadow(Loc, PrevDecl);
}
@@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ Sema::CheckClassTemplate(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK,
LookupResult Previous(*this, Name, NameLoc,
(SS.isEmpty() && TUK == TUK_Friend)
? LookupTagName : LookupOrdinaryName,
- ForRedeclaration);
+ forRedeclarationInCurContext());
if (SS.isNotEmpty() && !SS.isInvalid()) {
SemanticContext = computeDeclContext(SS, true);
if (!SemanticContext) {
@@ -1192,8 +1192,8 @@ Sema::CheckClassTemplate(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK,
// If there is a previous declaration with the same name, check
// whether this is a valid redeclaration.
- ClassTemplateDecl *PrevClassTemplate
- = dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(PrevDecl);
+ ClassTemplateDecl *PrevClassTemplate =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(PrevDecl);
// We may have found the injected-class-name of a class template,
// class template partial specialization, or class template specialization.
@@ -1484,6 +1484,9 @@ Sema::CheckClassTemplate(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK,
CurContext->addDecl(Friend);
}
+ if (PrevClassTemplate)
+ CheckRedeclarationModuleOwnership(NewTemplate, PrevClassTemplate);
+
if (Invalid) {
NewTemplate->setInvalidDecl();
NewClass->setInvalidDecl();
@@ -3677,7 +3680,7 @@ DeclResult Sema::ActOnVarTemplateSpecialization(
// Check that this isn't a redefinition of this specialization,
// merging with previous declarations.
LookupResult PrevSpec(*this, GetNameForDeclarator(D), LookupOrdinaryName,
- ForRedeclaration);
+ forRedeclarationInCurContext());
PrevSpec.addDecl(PrevDecl);
D.setRedeclaration(CheckVariableDeclaration(Specialization, PrevSpec));
} else if (Specialization->isStaticDataMember() &&
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud