In C++11 mode, implement the C++11 semantics for

[basic.lookup.classref]p1 and p4, which concerns name lookup for
nested-name-specifiers and template names, respectively, in a member
access expression. C++98/03 forces us to look both in the scope of the
object and in the current scope, then compare the results. C++11 just
takes the result from the scope of the object, if something is
found. Fixes <rdar://problem/11328502>. 

llvm-svn: 155935

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index b5b99f978ed..35d3cfa4330 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -354,12 +354,14 @@ void Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
     return;
   }
 
-  if (S && !ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
-    // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
+  if (S && !ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope &&
+      !(getLangOpts().CPlusPlus0x && !Found.empty())) {
+    // C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
     //   [...] If the lookup in the class of the object expression finds a
     //   template, the name is also looked up in the context of the entire
     //   postfix-expression and [...]
     //
+    // Note: C++11 does not perform this second lookup.
     LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, Found.getLookupName(), Found.getNameLoc(),
                             LookupOrdinaryName);
     LookupName(FoundOuter, S);