Diagnose the declaration of explicit specializations after an implicit

instantiation has already been required. To do so, keep track of the
point of instantiation for anything that can be instantiated.

llvm-svn: 83890

1 files changed, 61 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 8a12ac11684..8ca9089c5e3 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -2820,7 +2820,7 @@ Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec,
                                        TemplateNameLoc, isPartialSpecialization,
                                        TSK_ExplicitSpecialization))
     return true;
-
+  
   // The canonical type
   QualType CanonType;
   if (PrevDecl && 
@@ -2918,6 +2918,24 @@ Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec,
     CanonType = Context.getTypeDeclType(Specialization);
   }
 
+  // C++ [temp.expl.spec]p6:
+  //   If a template, a member template or the member of a class template is
+  //   explicitly specialized then that specialization shall be declared 
+  //   before the first use of that specialization that would cause an implicit
+  //   instantiation to take place, in every translation unit in which such a 
+  //   use occurs; no diagnostic is required.
+  if (PrevDecl && PrevDecl->getPointOfInstantiation().isValid()) {
+    SourceRange Range(TemplateNameLoc, RAngleLoc);
+    Diag(TemplateNameLoc, diag::err_specialization_after_instantiation)
+      << Context.getTypeDeclType(Specialization) << Range;
+
+    Diag(PrevDecl->getPointOfInstantiation(), 
+         diag::note_instantiation_required_here)
+      << (PrevDecl->getTemplateSpecializationKind() 
+                                                != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation);
+    return true;
+  }
+  
   // If this is not a friend, note that this is an explicit specialization.
   if (TUK != TUK_Friend)
     Specialization->setSpecializationKind(TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
@@ -2925,8 +2943,6 @@ Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec,
   // Check that this isn't a redefinition of this specialization.
   if (TUK == TUK_Definition) {
     if (RecordDecl *Def = Specialization->getDefinition(Context)) {
-      // FIXME: Should also handle explicit specialization after implicit
-      // instantiation with a special diagnostic.
       SourceRange Range(TemplateNameLoc, RAngleLoc);
       Diag(TemplateNameLoc, diag::err_redefinition)
         << Context.getTypeDeclType(Specialization) << Range;
@@ -3106,7 +3122,7 @@ Sema::CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(FunctionDecl *FD,
     return true;
   
   // FIXME: Check if the prior specialization has a point of instantiation.
-  // If so, we have run afoul of C++ [temp.expl.spec]p6.
+  // If so, we have run afoul of .
   
   // Check the scope of this explicit specialization.
   if (CheckTemplateSpecializationScope(*this, 
@@ -3114,11 +3130,29 @@ Sema::CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(FunctionDecl *FD,
                                        Specialization, FD->getLocation(), 
                                        false, TSK_ExplicitSpecialization))
     return true;
+
+  // C++ [temp.expl.spec]p6:
+  //   If a template, a member template or the member of a class template is
+  //   explicitly specialized then that spe- cialization shall be declared 
+  //   before the first use of that specialization that would cause an implicit
+  //   instantiation to take place, in every translation unit in which such a 
+  //   use occurs; no diagnostic is required.
+  FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *SpecInfo
+    = Specialization->getTemplateSpecializationInfo();
+  assert(SpecInfo && "Function template specialization info missing?");
+  if (SpecInfo->getPointOfInstantiation().isValid()) {
+    Diag(FD->getLocation(), diag::err_specialization_after_instantiation)
+      << FD;
+    Diag(SpecInfo->getPointOfInstantiation(), 
+         diag::note_instantiation_required_here)
+      << (Specialization->getTemplateSpecializationKind() 
+                                                != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation);
+    return true;
+  }
   
   // Mark the prior declaration as an explicit specialization, so that later
   // clients know that this is an explicit specialization.
-  // FIXME: Check for prior explicit instantiations?
-  Specialization->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
+  SpecInfo->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
   
   // Turn the given function declaration into a function template
   // specialization, with the template arguments from the previous
@@ -3156,6 +3190,8 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
   // Try to find the member we are instantiating.
   NamedDecl *Instantiation = 0;
   NamedDecl *InstantiatedFrom = 0;
+  MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo = 0;
+
   if (!PrevDecl) {
     // Nowhere to look anyway.
   } else if (FunctionDecl *Function = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(Member)) {
@@ -3164,6 +3200,7 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
         if (Context.hasSameType(Function->getType(), Method->getType())) {
           Instantiation = Method;
           InstantiatedFrom = Method->getInstantiatedFromMemberFunction();
+          MSInfo = Method->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
           break;
         }
       }
@@ -3173,11 +3210,13 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
       if (PrevVar->isStaticDataMember()) {
         Instantiation = PrevDecl;
         InstantiatedFrom = PrevVar->getInstantiatedFromStaticDataMember();
+        MSInfo = PrevVar->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
       }
   } else if (isa<RecordDecl>(Member)) {
     if (CXXRecordDecl *PrevRecord = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(PrevDecl)) {
       Instantiation = PrevDecl;
       InstantiatedFrom = PrevRecord->getInstantiatedFromMemberClass();
+      MSInfo = PrevRecord->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
     }
   }
   
@@ -3188,9 +3227,6 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
     return false;
   }
   
-  // FIXME: Check if the prior declaration has a point of instantiation.
-  // If so, we have run afoul of C++ [temp.expl.spec]p6.
-  
   // Make sure that this is a specialization of a member.
   if (!InstantiatedFrom) {
     Diag(Member->getLocation(), diag::err_spec_member_not_instantiated)
@@ -3199,6 +3235,22 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
     return true;
   }
   
+  // C++ [temp.expl.spec]p6:
+  //   If a template, a member template or the member of a class template is
+  //   explicitly specialized then that spe- cialization shall be declared 
+  //   before the first use of that specialization that would cause an implicit
+  //   instantiation to take place, in every translation unit in which such a 
+  //   use occurs; no diagnostic is required.
+  assert(MSInfo && "Member specialization info missing?");
+  if (MSInfo->getPointOfInstantiation().isValid()) {
+    Diag(Member->getLocation(), diag::err_specialization_after_instantiation)
+      << Member;
+    Diag(MSInfo->getPointOfInstantiation(), 
+         diag::note_instantiation_required_here)
+      << (MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind() != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation);
+    return true;
+  }
+  
   // Check the scope of this explicit specialization.
   if (CheckTemplateSpecializationScope(*this, 
                                        InstantiatedFrom,
@@ -3206,8 +3258,6 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, NamedDecl *&PrevDecl) {
                                        false, TSK_ExplicitSpecialization))
     return true;
 
-  // FIXME: Check for specialization-after-instantiation errors and such.
-  
   // Note that this is an explicit instantiation of a member.
   // the original declaration to note that it is an explicit specialization
   // (if it was previously an implicit instantiation). This latter step