Fix some i1/i8 confusion within _Atomic(bool) in IR generation, both

in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and
specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also
means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization,
rather than just creating a store.

On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic
conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR
generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make
sense.

llvm-svn: 154612

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 41f2116600b..31a8115f0b4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -2765,6 +2765,13 @@ Sema::PerformImplicitConversion(Expr *From, QualType ToType,
     llvm_unreachable("Improper third standard conversion");
   }
 
+  // If this conversion sequence involved a scalar -> atomic conversion, perform
+  // that conversion now.
+  if (const AtomicType *ToAtomic = ToType->getAs<AtomicType>())
+    if (Context.hasSameType(ToAtomic->getValueType(), From->getType()))
+      From = ImpCastExprToType(From, ToType, CK_NonAtomicToAtomic, VK_RValue, 0,
+                               CCK).take();
+      
   return Owned(From);
 }