Rework implementation of DR1492: Apply the resolution to operator delete too,

since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.

llvm-svn: 166372

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 0adcfc15201..f0bd8105743 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -9379,7 +9379,7 @@ CheckOperatorNewDeclaration(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *FnDecl) {
 }
 
 static bool
-CheckOperatorDeleteDeclaration(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *FnDecl) {
+CheckOperatorDeleteDeclaration(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *FnDecl) {
   // C++ [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]p1:
   //   A program is ill-formed if deallocation functions are declared in a
   //   namespace scope other than global scope or declared static in global