diff options
author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2018-01-02 23:52:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2018-01-02 23:52:42 +0000 |
commit | 50e291eaf28383e8b9c061dedc3aa0acb9d0c9e6 (patch) | |
tree | 227ed404063ea5ef3ba4a45a8610ebdf8053c03e /clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | |
parent | 96625fdc6bff9f9bbf96239860a501778623b680 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-50e291eaf28383e8b9c061dedc3aa0acb9d0c9e6.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-50e291eaf28383e8b9c061dedc3aa0acb9d0c9e6.zip |
Fix and simplify handling of return type for (generic) lambda conversion function to function pointer.
Previously, we would:
* compute the type of the conversion function and static invoker as a
side-effect of template argument deduction for a conversion
* re-compute the type as part of deduced return type deduction when building
the conversion function itself
Neither of these turns out to be quite correct. There are other ways to reach a
declaration of the conversion function than in a conversion (such as an
explicit call or friend declaration), and performing auto deduction causes the
function type to be rebuilt in the context of the lambda closure type (which is
different from the context in which it originally appeared, resulting in
spurious substitution failures for constructs that are valid in one context but
not the other, such as the use of an enclosing class's "this" pointer).
This patch switches us to use a different strategy: as before, we use the
declared type of the operator() to form the type of the conversion function and
invoker, but we now populate that type as part of return type deduction for the
conversion function. And the invoker is now treated as simply being an
implementation detail of building the conversion function, and isn't given
special treatment by template argument deduction for the conversion function
any more.
llvm-svn: 321683
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | 70 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp index ceded02e394..5e24649c71b 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp @@ -12215,30 +12215,27 @@ void Sema::DefineImplicitLambdaToFunctionPointerConversion( SourceLocation CurrentLocation, CXXConversionDecl *Conv) { SynthesizedFunctionScope Scope(*this, Conv); + assert(!Conv->getReturnType()->isUndeducedType()); CXXRecordDecl *Lambda = Conv->getParent(); - CXXMethodDecl *CallOp = Lambda->getLambdaCallOperator(); - // If we are defining a specialization of a conversion to function-ptr - // cache the deduced template arguments for this specialization - // so that we can use them to retrieve the corresponding call-operator - // and static-invoker. - const TemplateArgumentList *DeducedTemplateArgs = nullptr; - - // Retrieve the corresponding call-operator specialization. - if (Lambda->isGenericLambda()) { - assert(Conv->isFunctionTemplateSpecialization()); - FunctionTemplateDecl *CallOpTemplate = - CallOp->getDescribedFunctionTemplate(); - DeducedTemplateArgs = Conv->getTemplateSpecializationArgs(); - void *InsertPos = nullptr; - FunctionDecl *CallOpSpec = CallOpTemplate->findSpecialization( - DeducedTemplateArgs->asArray(), - InsertPos); - assert(CallOpSpec && - "Conversion operator must have a corresponding call operator"); - CallOp = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(CallOpSpec); + FunctionDecl *CallOp = Lambda->getLambdaCallOperator(); + FunctionDecl *Invoker = Lambda->getLambdaStaticInvoker(); + + if (auto *TemplateArgs = Conv->getTemplateSpecializationArgs()) { + CallOp = InstantiateFunctionDeclaration( + CallOp->getDescribedFunctionTemplate(), TemplateArgs, CurrentLocation); + if (!CallOp) + return; + + Invoker = InstantiateFunctionDeclaration( + Invoker->getDescribedFunctionTemplate(), TemplateArgs, CurrentLocation); + if (!Invoker) + return; } + if (CallOp->isInvalidDecl()) + return; + // Mark the call operator referenced (and add to pending instantiations // if necessary). // For both the conversion and static-invoker template specializations @@ -12246,39 +12243,24 @@ void Sema::DefineImplicitLambdaToFunctionPointerConversion( // to the PendingInstantiations. MarkFunctionReferenced(CurrentLocation, CallOp); - // Retrieve the static invoker... - CXXMethodDecl *Invoker = Lambda->getLambdaStaticInvoker(); - // ... and get the corresponding specialization for a generic lambda. - if (Lambda->isGenericLambda()) { - assert(DeducedTemplateArgs && - "Must have deduced template arguments from Conversion Operator"); - FunctionTemplateDecl *InvokeTemplate = - Invoker->getDescribedFunctionTemplate(); - void *InsertPos = nullptr; - FunctionDecl *InvokeSpec = InvokeTemplate->findSpecialization( - DeducedTemplateArgs->asArray(), - InsertPos); - assert(InvokeSpec && - "Must have a corresponding static invoker specialization"); - Invoker = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(InvokeSpec); - } + // Fill in the __invoke function with a dummy implementation. IR generation + // will fill in the actual details. Update its type in case it contained + // an 'auto'. + Invoker->markUsed(Context); + Invoker->setReferenced(); + Invoker->setType(Conv->getReturnType()->getPointeeType()); + Invoker->setBody(new (Context) CompoundStmt(Conv->getLocation())); + // Construct the body of the conversion function { return __invoke; }. Expr *FunctionRef = BuildDeclRefExpr(Invoker, Invoker->getType(), - VK_LValue, Conv->getLocation()).get(); + VK_LValue, Conv->getLocation()).get(); assert(FunctionRef && "Can't refer to __invoke function?"); Stmt *Return = BuildReturnStmt(Conv->getLocation(), FunctionRef).get(); Conv->setBody(CompoundStmt::Create(Context, Return, Conv->getLocation(), Conv->getLocation())); - Conv->markUsed(Context); Conv->setReferenced(); - // Fill in the __invoke function with a dummy implementation. IR generation - // will fill in the actual details. - Invoker->markUsed(Context); - Invoker->setReferenced(); - Invoker->setBody(new (Context) CompoundStmt(Conv->getLocation())); - if (ASTMutationListener *L = getASTMutationListener()) { L->CompletedImplicitDefinition(Conv); L->CompletedImplicitDefinition(Invoker); |