summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-27 23:10:48 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-27 23:10:48 +0000
commit333489bba35d91e4ddb101f441087177c492d090 (patch)
tree6b658646aed7c601a730536e09816cecc7ff0c65 /clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
parent669f1d0b0b7ab0fd05f4cf672eab6dbe3f358953 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-333489bba35d91e4ddb101f441087177c492d090.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-333489bba35d91e4ddb101f441087177c492d090.zip
Initial implementation of parsing, semantic analysis, and template
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as typename T::type The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the simple-template-id form, e.g., typename T::template apply<U, V> Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this point we don't have any representation of a class template specialization whose template-name is unknown. Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for template instantiation that works for simple examples. llvm-svn: 67875
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index 8fb2811ce51..a879989b33d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -127,17 +127,20 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
if (TypeDecl *Type = dyn_cast<TypeDecl>(SD)) {
// Determine whether we have a class (or, in C++0x, an enum) or
// a typedef thereof. If so, build the nested-name-specifier.
- QualType T;
- if (TypedefDecl *TD = dyn_cast<TypedefDecl>(SD)) {
+ QualType T = Context.getTypeDeclType(Type);
+ bool AcceptableType = false;
+ if (T->isDependentType())
+ AcceptableType = true;
+ else if (TypedefDecl *TD = dyn_cast<TypedefDecl>(SD)) {
if (TD->getUnderlyingType()->isRecordType() ||
(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x &&
TD->getUnderlyingType()->isEnumeralType()))
- T = Context.getTypeDeclType(TD);
+ AcceptableType = true;
} else if (isa<RecordDecl>(Type) ||
(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x && isa<EnumDecl>(Type)))
- T = Context.getTypeDeclType(Type);
+ AcceptableType = true;
- if (!T.isNull())
+ if (AcceptableType)
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, false,
T.getTypePtr());
}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud