PR9547: If we're parsing a simple-declaration that contains a tag definition,

and we see an ill-formed declarator that would probably be well-formed if the
tag definition were just missing a semicolon, use that as the diagnostic
instead of producing some other mysterious error.

llvm-svn: 195163

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
index 538c16eeb25..c2f16157b8e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
@@ -333,6 +333,12 @@ bool Declarator::isStaticMember() {
              getName().OperatorFunctionId.Operator);
 }
 
+bool DeclSpec::hasTagDefinition() const {
+  if (!TypeSpecOwned)
+    return false;
+  return cast<TagDecl>(getRepAsDecl())->isCompleteDefinition();
+}
+
 /// getParsedSpecifiers - Return a bitmask of which flavors of specifiers this
 /// declaration specifier includes.
 ///