diff options
author | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2018-01-04 02:17:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2018-01-04 02:17:40 +0000 |
commit | b6ec4a33fb2b6e9ea9bb5ace211504113fbe64a1 (patch) | |
tree | ba6f9d5c770113b4aaeca3eba333ea6f763c7e60 /clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp | |
parent | a3ce1fdababaa507313477379d45a40b81d92f55 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-b6ec4a33fb2b6e9ea9bb5ace211504113fbe64a1.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-b6ec4a33fb2b6e9ea9bb5ace211504113fbe64a1.zip |
[Modules] Allow modules specified by -fmodule-map-file to shadow implicitly found ones
When modules come from module map files explicitly specified by
-fmodule-map-file= arguments, allow those to override/shadow modules
with the same name that are found implicitly by header search. If such a
module is looked up by name (e.g. @import), we will always find the one
from -fmodule-map-file. If we try to use a shadowed module by including
one of its headers report an error.
This enables developers to force use of a specific copy of their module
to be used if there are multiple copies that would otherwise be visible,
for example if they develop modules that are installed in the default
search paths.
Patch originally by Ben Langmuir,
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151116/143425.html
Based on cfe-dev discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/046164.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31269
rdar://problem/23612102
llvm-svn: 321781
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp | 17 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp b/clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp index ca3e70fd106..77ee1faf283 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp @@ -1655,12 +1655,18 @@ bool Preprocessor::checkModuleIsAvailable(const LangOptions &LangOpts, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags, Module *M) { Module::Requirement Requirement; Module::UnresolvedHeaderDirective MissingHeader; - if (M->isAvailable(LangOpts, TargetInfo, Requirement, MissingHeader)) + Module *ShadowingModule = nullptr; + if (M->isAvailable(LangOpts, TargetInfo, Requirement, MissingHeader, + ShadowingModule)) return false; if (MissingHeader.FileNameLoc.isValid()) { Diags.Report(MissingHeader.FileNameLoc, diag::err_module_header_missing) << MissingHeader.IsUmbrella << MissingHeader.FileName; + } else if (ShadowingModule) { + Diags.Report(M->DefinitionLoc, diag::err_module_shadowed) << M->Name; + Diags.Report(ShadowingModule->DefinitionLoc, + diag::note_previous_definition); } else { // FIXME: Track the location at which the requirement was specified, and // use it here. @@ -2024,6 +2030,15 @@ void Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(SourceLocation HashLoc, // Determine if we're switching to building a new submodule, and which one. if (auto *M = SuggestedModule.getModule()) { + if (M->getTopLevelModule()->ShadowingModule) { + // We are building a submodule that belongs to a shadowed module. This + // means we find header files in the shadowed module. + Diag(M->DefinitionLoc, diag::err_module_build_shadowed_submodule) + << M->getFullModuleName(); + Diag(M->getTopLevelModule()->ShadowingModule->DefinitionLoc, + diag::note_previous_definition); + return; + } // When building a pch, -fmodule-name tells the compiler to textually // include headers in the specified module. We are not building the // specified module. |