Switch users of the 'for (StmtRange range = stmt->children(); range; ++range)‘ pattern to range for loops.

The pattern was born out of the lack of range-based for loops in C++98
and is somewhat obscure. No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 241300

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
index bece41e9ecb..f1fc8c45f1e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
@@ -970,8 +970,8 @@ bool CodeGenFunction::ContainsLabel(const Stmt *S, bool IgnoreCaseStmts) {
     IgnoreCaseStmts = true;
 
   // Scan subexpressions for verboten labels.
-  for (Stmt::const_child_range I = S->children(); I; ++I)
-    if (ContainsLabel(*I, IgnoreCaseStmts))
+  for (const Stmt *SubStmt : S->children())
+    if (ContainsLabel(SubStmt, IgnoreCaseStmts))
       return true;
 
   return false;
@@ -994,8 +994,8 @@ bool CodeGenFunction::containsBreak(const Stmt *S) {
     return true;
 
   // Scan subexpressions for verboten breaks.
-  for (Stmt::const_child_range I = S->children(); I; ++I)
-    if (containsBreak(*I))
+  for (const Stmt *SubStmt : S->children())
+    if (containsBreak(SubStmt))
       return true;
 
   return false;