diff options
author | David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> | 2015-01-28 19:50:09 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> | 2015-01-28 19:50:09 +0000 |
commit | 298720d324fc8ad041b3b9d9bb9a80982ee53ced (patch) | |
tree | 1ed2f46e4bc859a7598273f45c4962224e2836d4 /clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp | |
parent | 4058dd9f3f17bb91e96bda91ed5ecad183a30cb2 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-298720d324fc8ad041b3b9d9bb9a80982ee53ced.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-298720d324fc8ad041b3b9d9bb9a80982ee53ced.zip |
DebugInfo: Attribute implicit boolean tests to the expression being tested, not to the outer use of that expression.
This is half a fix for a GDB test suite failure that expects to start at
'a' in the following code:
void func(int a)
if (a
&&
b)
...
But instead, without this change, the comparison was assigned to '&&'
(well, worse actually - because there was a chained 'a && b && c' and it
was assigned to the second '&&' because of a recursive application of
this bug) and then the load folded into the comparison so breaking on
the function started at '&&' instead of 'a'.
The other part of this needs to be fixed in LLVM where it's ignoring the
location of the icmp and instead using the location of the branch
instruction.
The fix to the conditional operator is actually a no-op currently,
because the conditional operator's location coincides with 'a' (the
start of the conditional expression) but should probably be '?' instead.
See the FIXME in the test case that mentions the ARCMigration tool
failures when I tried to make that change.
llvm-svn: 227356
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp | 21 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp index d08e011ea3c..ae78aa00e3a 100644 --- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp @@ -1058,8 +1058,11 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(const Expr *Cond, uint64_t RHSCount = Cnt.getCount(); ConditionalEvaluation eval(*this); - EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondBOp->getLHS(), LHSTrue, FalseBlock, RHSCount); - EmitBlock(LHSTrue); + { + ApplyDebugLocation DL(*this, Cond); + EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondBOp->getLHS(), LHSTrue, FalseBlock, RHSCount); + EmitBlock(LHSTrue); + } // Any temporaries created here are conditional. Cnt.beginRegion(Builder); @@ -1103,8 +1106,11 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(const Expr *Cond, uint64_t RHSCount = TrueCount - LHSCount; ConditionalEvaluation eval(*this); - EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondBOp->getLHS(), TrueBlock, LHSFalse, LHSCount); - EmitBlock(LHSFalse); + { + ApplyDebugLocation DL(*this, Cond); + EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondBOp->getLHS(), TrueBlock, LHSFalse, LHSCount); + EmitBlock(LHSFalse); + } // Any temporaries created here are conditional. Cnt.beginRegion(Builder); @@ -1151,8 +1157,11 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(const Expr *Cond, cond.begin(*this); EmitBlock(LHSBlock); Cnt.beginRegion(Builder); - EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondOp->getLHS(), TrueBlock, FalseBlock, - LHSScaledTrueCount); + { + ApplyDebugLocation DL(*this, Cond); + EmitBranchOnBoolExpr(CondOp->getLHS(), TrueBlock, FalseBlock, + LHSScaledTrueCount); + } cond.end(*this); cond.begin(*this); |