diff options
| author | Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com> | 2019-09-17 08:09:56 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com> | 2019-09-17 08:09:56 +0000 |
| commit | 645593844164187a2de37b40e62cd790cfb48a03 (patch) | |
| tree | 0d790bd63cedfb8052a44b7507d1c67840f4326a /clang/lib/Basic | |
| parent | 3ee98a1455cbd1ba6fcb3f74ddf137c503734a97 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-645593844164187a2de37b40e62cd790cfb48a03.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-645593844164187a2de37b40e62cd790cfb48a03.zip | |
[RISCV] Define __riscv_cmodel_medlow and __riscv_cmodel_medany correctly
RISC-V LLVM was only implement small/medlow code model, so it defined
__riscv_cmodel_medlow directly without check.
Now, we have medium/medany code model in RISC-V back-end, it should
define according the actually code model.
Reviewed By: lewis-revill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67065
llvm-svn: 372078
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Basic')
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp index 0a8df86fc88..ab8272c034f 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp @@ -88,8 +88,14 @@ void RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions &Opts, Builder.defineMacro("__riscv"); bool Is64Bit = getTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::riscv64; Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_xlen", Is64Bit ? "64" : "32"); - // TODO: modify when more code models are supported. - Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medlow"); + StringRef CodeModel = getTargetOpts().CodeModel; + if (CodeModel == "default") + CodeModel = "small"; + + if (CodeModel == "small") + Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medlow"); + else if (CodeModel == "medium") + Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medany"); StringRef ABIName = getABI(); if (ABIName == "ilp32f" || ABIName == "lp64f") |
