diff options
author | Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh@gmail.com> | 2014-05-28 11:19:43 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh@gmail.com> | 2014-05-28 11:19:43 +0000 |
commit | a9c452121a395908ed3f8e4034fc55254933bbd1 (patch) | |
tree | 25f22447e2222a335c10ec9d012c2af8f3259670 /clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp | |
parent | 753d70ce537520771450f5140d5b4316e8599785 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-a9c452121a395908ed3f8e4034fc55254933bbd1.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-a9c452121a395908ed3f8e4034fc55254933bbd1.zip |
Fix line endings.
llvm-svn: 209727
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp | 224 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp index 51a80776e77..facfa11a39a 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp @@ -1,112 +1,112 @@ -//===- ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ --*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// This file defines a representation for logical expressions with SExpr leaves
-// that are used as part of fact-checking capability expressions.
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafetyLogical.h"
-
-using namespace llvm;
-using namespace clang::threadSafety::lexpr;
-
-// Implication. We implement De Morgan's Laws by maintaining LNeg and RNeg
-// to keep track of whether LHS and RHS are negated.
-static bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, bool LNeg, const LExpr *RHS, bool RNeg) {
- // In comments below, we write => for implication.
-
- // Calculates the logical AND implication operator.
- const auto LeftAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
- return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) &&
- implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
- };
- const auto RightAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
- return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) &&
- implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg);
- };
-
- // Calculates the logical OR implication operator.
- const auto LeftOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
- return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) ||
- implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
- };
- const auto RightOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
- return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) ||
- implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg);
- };
-
- // Recurse on right.
- switch (RHS->kind()) {
- case LExpr::And:
- // When performing right recursion:
- // C => A & B [if] C => A and C => B
- // When performing right recursion (negated):
- // C => !(A & B) [if] C => !A | !B [===] C => !A or C => !B
- return RNeg ? RightOrOperator(cast<And>(RHS))
- : RightAndOperator(cast<And>(RHS));
- case LExpr::Or:
- // When performing right recursion:
- // C => (A | B) [if] C => A or C => B
- // When performing right recursion (negated):
- // C => !(A | B) [if] C => !A & !B [===] C => !A and C => !B
- return RNeg ? RightAndOperator(cast<Or>(RHS))
- : RightOrOperator(cast<Or>(RHS));
- case LExpr::Not:
- // Note that C => !A is very different from !(C => A). It would be incorrect
- // to return !implies(LHS, RHS).
- return implies(LHS, LNeg, cast<Not>(RHS)->exp(), !RNeg);
- case LExpr::Terminal:
- // After reaching the terminal, it's time to recurse on the left.
- break;
- }
-
- // RHS is now a terminal. Recurse on Left.
- switch (LHS->kind()) {
- case LExpr::And:
- // When performing left recursion:
- // A & B => C [if] A => C or B => C
- // When performing left recursion (negated):
- // !(A & B) => C [if] !A | !B => C [===] !A => C and !B => C
- return LNeg ? LeftAndOperator(cast<And>(LHS))
- : LeftOrOperator(cast<And>(LHS));
- case LExpr::Or:
- // When performing left recursion:
- // A | B => C [if] A => C and B => C
- // When performing left recursion (negated):
- // !(A | B) => C [if] !A & !B => C [===] !A => C or !B => C
- return LNeg ? LeftOrOperator(cast<Or>(LHS))
- : LeftAndOperator(cast<Or>(LHS));
- case LExpr::Not:
- // Note that A => !C is very different from !(A => C). It would be incorrect
- // to return !implies(LHS, RHS).
- return implies(cast<Not>(LHS)->exp(), !LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
- case LExpr::Terminal:
- // After reaching the terminal, it's time to perform identity comparisons.
- break;
- }
-
- // A => A
- // !A => !A
- if (LNeg != RNeg)
- return false;
-
- // FIXME -- this should compare SExprs for equality, not pointer equality.
- return cast<Terminal>(LHS)->expr() == cast<Terminal>(RHS)->expr();
-}
-
-namespace clang {
-namespace threadSafety {
-namespace lexpr {
-
-bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, const LExpr *RHS) {
- // Start out by assuming that LHS and RHS are not negated.
- return ::implies(LHS, false, RHS, false);
-}
-}
-}
-}
+//===- ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ --*-===// +// +// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure +// +// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source +// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// This file defines a representation for logical expressions with SExpr leaves +// that are used as part of fact-checking capability expressions. +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafetyLogical.h" + +using namespace llvm; +using namespace clang::threadSafety::lexpr; + +// Implication. We implement De Morgan's Laws by maintaining LNeg and RNeg +// to keep track of whether LHS and RHS are negated. +static bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, bool LNeg, const LExpr *RHS, bool RNeg) { + // In comments below, we write => for implication. + + // Calculates the logical AND implication operator. + const auto LeftAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { + return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) && + implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); + }; + const auto RightAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { + return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) && + implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg); + }; + + // Calculates the logical OR implication operator. + const auto LeftOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { + return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) || + implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); + }; + const auto RightOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { + return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) || + implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg); + }; + + // Recurse on right. + switch (RHS->kind()) { + case LExpr::And: + // When performing right recursion: + // C => A & B [if] C => A and C => B + // When performing right recursion (negated): + // C => !(A & B) [if] C => !A | !B [===] C => !A or C => !B + return RNeg ? RightOrOperator(cast<And>(RHS)) + : RightAndOperator(cast<And>(RHS)); + case LExpr::Or: + // When performing right recursion: + // C => (A | B) [if] C => A or C => B + // When performing right recursion (negated): + // C => !(A | B) [if] C => !A & !B [===] C => !A and C => !B + return RNeg ? RightAndOperator(cast<Or>(RHS)) + : RightOrOperator(cast<Or>(RHS)); + case LExpr::Not: + // Note that C => !A is very different from !(C => A). It would be incorrect + // to return !implies(LHS, RHS). + return implies(LHS, LNeg, cast<Not>(RHS)->exp(), !RNeg); + case LExpr::Terminal: + // After reaching the terminal, it's time to recurse on the left. + break; + } + + // RHS is now a terminal. Recurse on Left. + switch (LHS->kind()) { + case LExpr::And: + // When performing left recursion: + // A & B => C [if] A => C or B => C + // When performing left recursion (negated): + // !(A & B) => C [if] !A | !B => C [===] !A => C and !B => C + return LNeg ? LeftAndOperator(cast<And>(LHS)) + : LeftOrOperator(cast<And>(LHS)); + case LExpr::Or: + // When performing left recursion: + // A | B => C [if] A => C and B => C + // When performing left recursion (negated): + // !(A | B) => C [if] !A & !B => C [===] !A => C or !B => C + return LNeg ? LeftOrOperator(cast<Or>(LHS)) + : LeftAndOperator(cast<Or>(LHS)); + case LExpr::Not: + // Note that A => !C is very different from !(A => C). It would be incorrect + // to return !implies(LHS, RHS). + return implies(cast<Not>(LHS)->exp(), !LNeg, RHS, RNeg); + case LExpr::Terminal: + // After reaching the terminal, it's time to perform identity comparisons. + break; + } + + // A => A + // !A => !A + if (LNeg != RNeg) + return false; + + // FIXME -- this should compare SExprs for equality, not pointer equality. + return cast<Terminal>(LHS)->expr() == cast<Terminal>(RHS)->expr(); +} + +namespace clang { +namespace threadSafety { +namespace lexpr { + +bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, const LExpr *RHS) { + // Start out by assuming that LHS and RHS are not negated. + return ::implies(LHS, false, RHS, false); +} +} +} +} |