summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2015-12-03 01:36:22 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2015-12-03 01:36:22 +0000
commit0c6124ba82063b05b9c85b63bb29ec354aa1be0b (patch)
treec5cb08e6eb95fe213116ac9bbad149a05d31577a /clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
parenta30cee627201032bc7ea66808d057d97f52b852f (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-0c6124ba82063b05b9c85b63bb29ec354aa1be0b.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-0c6124ba82063b05b9c85b63bb29ec354aa1be0b.zip
PR17381: Treat undefined behavior during expression evaluation as an unmodeled
side-effect, so that we don't allow speculative evaluation of such expressions during code generation. This caused a diagnostic quality regression, so fix constant expression diagnostics to prefer either the first "can't be constant folded" diagnostic or the first "not a constant expression" diagnostic depending on the kind of evaluation we're doing. This was always the intent, but didn't quite work correctly before. This results in certain initializers that used to be constant initializers to no longer be; in particular, things like: float f = 1e100; are no longer accepted in C. This seems appropriate, as such constructs would lead to code being executed if sanitizers are enabled. llvm-svn: 254574
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp115
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index a4d6a8950e4..d80f466d99f 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -473,6 +473,10 @@ namespace {
/// notes attached to it will also be stored, otherwise they will not be.
bool HasActiveDiagnostic;
+ /// \brief Have we emitted a diagnostic explaining why we couldn't constant
+ /// fold (not just why it's not strictly a constant expression)?
+ bool HasFoldFailureDiagnostic;
+
enum EvaluationMode {
/// Evaluate as a constant expression. Stop if we find that the expression
/// is not a constant expression.
@@ -537,7 +541,7 @@ namespace {
BottomFrame(*this, SourceLocation(), nullptr, nullptr, nullptr),
EvaluatingDecl((const ValueDecl *)nullptr),
EvaluatingDeclValue(nullptr), HasActiveDiagnostic(false),
- EvalMode(Mode) {}
+ HasFoldFailureDiagnostic(false), EvalMode(Mode) {}
void setEvaluatingDecl(APValue::LValueBase Base, APValue &Value) {
EvaluatingDecl = Base;
@@ -597,7 +601,7 @@ namespace {
/// Diagnose that the evaluation cannot be folded.
OptionalDiagnostic Diag(SourceLocation Loc, diag::kind DiagId
= diag::note_invalid_subexpr_in_const_expr,
- unsigned ExtraNotes = 0) {
+ unsigned ExtraNotes = 0, bool IsCCEDiag = false) {
if (EvalStatus.Diag) {
// If we have a prior diagnostic, it will be noting that the expression
// isn't a constant expression. This diagnostic is more important,
@@ -610,10 +614,9 @@ namespace {
case EM_ConstantFold:
case EM_IgnoreSideEffects:
case EM_EvaluateForOverflow:
- if (!EvalStatus.HasSideEffects)
+ if (!HasFoldFailureDiagnostic)
break;
- // We've had side-effects; we want the diagnostic from them, not
- // some later problem.
+ // We've already failed to fold something. Keep that diagnostic.
case EM_ConstantExpression:
case EM_PotentialConstantExpression:
case EM_ConstantExpressionUnevaluated:
@@ -632,6 +635,7 @@ namespace {
CallStackNotes = 0;
HasActiveDiagnostic = true;
+ HasFoldFailureDiagnostic = !IsCCEDiag;
EvalStatus.Diag->clear();
EvalStatus.Diag->reserve(1 + ExtraNotes + CallStackNotes);
addDiag(Loc, DiagId);
@@ -645,9 +649,9 @@ namespace {
OptionalDiagnostic Diag(const Expr *E, diag::kind DiagId
= diag::note_invalid_subexpr_in_const_expr,
- unsigned ExtraNotes = 0) {
+ unsigned ExtraNotes = 0, bool IsCCEDiag = false) {
if (EvalStatus.Diag)
- return Diag(E->getExprLoc(), DiagId, ExtraNotes);
+ return Diag(E->getExprLoc(), DiagId, ExtraNotes, IsCCEDiag);
HasActiveDiagnostic = false;
return OptionalDiagnostic();
}
@@ -667,7 +671,7 @@ namespace {
HasActiveDiagnostic = false;
return OptionalDiagnostic();
}
- return Diag(Loc, DiagId, ExtraNotes);
+ return Diag(Loc, DiagId, ExtraNotes, true);
}
/// Add a note to a prior diagnostic.
@@ -1541,10 +1545,11 @@ static bool EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(const Expr *E, bool &Result,
}
template<typename T>
-static void HandleOverflow(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
+static bool HandleOverflow(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
const T &SrcValue, QualType DestType) {
Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_overflow)
<< SrcValue << DestType;
+ return Info.noteSideEffect();
}
static bool HandleFloatToIntCast(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
@@ -1558,7 +1563,7 @@ static bool HandleFloatToIntCast(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
bool ignored;
if (Value.convertToInteger(Result, llvm::APFloat::rmTowardZero, &ignored)
& APFloat::opInvalidOp)
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
return true;
}
@@ -1570,7 +1575,7 @@ static bool HandleFloatToFloatCast(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
if (Result.convert(Info.Ctx.getFloatTypeSemantics(DestType),
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven, &ignored)
& APFloat::opOverflow)
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
return true;
}
@@ -1593,7 +1598,7 @@ static bool HandleIntToFloatCast(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
if (Result.convertFromAPInt(Value, Value.isSigned(),
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven)
& APFloat::opOverflow)
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, DestType);
return true;
}
@@ -1669,23 +1674,26 @@ static bool EvalAndBitcastToAPInt(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
/// bits, and check for overflow in the original type (if that type was not an
/// unsigned type).
template<typename Operation>
-static APSInt CheckedIntArithmetic(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
- const APSInt &LHS, const APSInt &RHS,
- unsigned BitWidth, Operation Op) {
- if (LHS.isUnsigned())
- return Op(LHS, RHS);
+static bool CheckedIntArithmetic(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
+ const APSInt &LHS, const APSInt &RHS,
+ unsigned BitWidth, Operation Op,
+ APSInt &Result) {
+ if (LHS.isUnsigned()) {
+ Result = Op(LHS, RHS);
+ return true;
+ }
APSInt Value(Op(LHS.extend(BitWidth), RHS.extend(BitWidth)), false);
- APSInt Result = Value.trunc(LHS.getBitWidth());
+ Result = Value.trunc(LHS.getBitWidth());
if (Result.extend(BitWidth) != Value) {
if (Info.checkingForOverflow())
Info.Ctx.getDiagnostics().Report(E->getExprLoc(),
- diag::warn_integer_constant_overflow)
+ diag::warn_integer_constant_overflow)
<< Result.toString(10) << E->getType();
else
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, E->getType());
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, Value, E->getType());
}
- return Result;
+ return true;
}
/// Perform the given binary integer operation.
@@ -1697,17 +1705,14 @@ static bool handleIntIntBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E, const APSInt &LHS,
Info.Diag(E);
return false;
case BO_Mul:
- Result = CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() * 2,
- std::multiplies<APSInt>());
- return true;
+ return CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() * 2,
+ std::multiplies<APSInt>(), Result);
case BO_Add:
- Result = CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() + 1,
- std::plus<APSInt>());
- return true;
+ return CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() + 1,
+ std::plus<APSInt>(), Result);
case BO_Sub:
- Result = CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() + 1,
- std::minus<APSInt>());
- return true;
+ return CheckedIntArithmetic(Info, E, LHS, RHS, LHS.getBitWidth() + 1,
+ std::minus<APSInt>(), Result);
case BO_And: Result = LHS & RHS; return true;
case BO_Xor: Result = LHS ^ RHS; return true;
case BO_Or: Result = LHS | RHS; return true;
@@ -1717,11 +1722,13 @@ static bool handleIntIntBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E, const APSInt &LHS,
Info.Diag(E, diag::note_expr_divide_by_zero);
return false;
}
- // Check for overflow case: INT_MIN / -1 or INT_MIN % -1.
+ Result = (Opcode == BO_Rem ? LHS % RHS : LHS / RHS);
+ // Check for overflow case: INT_MIN / -1 or INT_MIN % -1. APSInt supports
+ // this operation and gives the two's complement result.
if (RHS.isNegative() && RHS.isAllOnesValue() &&
LHS.isSigned() && LHS.isMinSignedValue())
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, -LHS.extend(LHS.getBitWidth() + 1), E->getType());
- Result = (Opcode == BO_Rem ? LHS % RHS : LHS / RHS);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, -LHS.extend(LHS.getBitWidth() + 1),
+ E->getType());
return true;
case BO_Shl: {
if (Info.getLangOpts().OpenCL)
@@ -1809,8 +1816,11 @@ static bool handleFloatFloatBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
break;
}
- if (LHS.isInfinity() || LHS.isNaN())
+ if (LHS.isInfinity() || LHS.isNaN()) {
Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_float_arithmetic) << LHS.isNaN();
+ // Undefined behavior is a side-effect.
+ return Info.noteSideEffect();
+ }
return true;
}
@@ -3009,7 +3019,7 @@ struct IncDecSubobjectHandler {
if (!WasNegative && Value.isNegative() &&
isOverflowingIntegerType(Info.Ctx, SubobjType)) {
APSInt ActualValue(Value, /*IsUnsigned*/true);
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, ActualValue, SubobjType);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, ActualValue, SubobjType);
}
} else {
--Value;
@@ -3019,7 +3029,7 @@ struct IncDecSubobjectHandler {
unsigned BitWidth = Value.getBitWidth();
APSInt ActualValue(Value.sext(BitWidth + 1), /*IsUnsigned*/false);
ActualValue.setBit(BitWidth);
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, ActualValue, SubobjType);
+ return HandleOverflow(Info, E, ActualValue, SubobjType);
}
}
return true;
@@ -6240,8 +6250,8 @@ static bool EvaluateBuiltinConstantP(ASTContext &Ctx, const Expr *Arg) {
APValue &V = Result.Val;
if (V.getKind() == APValue::Int)
return true;
-
- return EvaluateBuiltinConstantPForLValue(V);
+ if (V.getKind() == APValue::LValue)
+ return EvaluateBuiltinConstantPForLValue(V);
} else if (ArgType->isFloatingType() || ArgType->isAnyComplexType()) {
return Arg->isEvaluatable(Ctx);
} else if (ArgType->isPointerType() || Arg->isGLValue()) {
@@ -7258,7 +7268,7 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
LValue LHSValue, RHSValue;
bool LHSOK = EvaluatePointer(E->getLHS(), LHSValue, Info);
- if (!LHSOK && Info.keepEvaluatingAfterFailure())
+ if (!LHSOK && !Info.keepEvaluatingAfterFailure())
return false;
if (!EvaluatePointer(E->getRHS(), RHSValue, Info) || !LHSOK)
@@ -7270,21 +7280,20 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
if (E->getOpcode() == BO_Sub) {
// Handle &&A - &&B.
if (!LHSValue.Offset.isZero() || !RHSValue.Offset.isZero())
- return false;
+ return Error(E);
const Expr *LHSExpr = LHSValue.Base.dyn_cast<const Expr*>();
const Expr *RHSExpr = RHSValue.Base.dyn_cast<const Expr*>();
if (!LHSExpr || !RHSExpr)
- return false;
+ return Error(E);
const AddrLabelExpr *LHSAddrExpr = dyn_cast<AddrLabelExpr>(LHSExpr);
const AddrLabelExpr *RHSAddrExpr = dyn_cast<AddrLabelExpr>(RHSExpr);
if (!LHSAddrExpr || !RHSAddrExpr)
- return false;
+ return Error(E);
// Make sure both labels come from the same function.
if (LHSAddrExpr->getLabel()->getDeclContext() !=
RHSAddrExpr->getLabel()->getDeclContext())
- return false;
- Result = APValue(LHSAddrExpr, RHSAddrExpr);
- return true;
+ return Error(E);
+ return Success(APValue(LHSAddrExpr, RHSAddrExpr), E);
}
// Inequalities and subtractions between unrelated pointers have
// unspecified or undefined behavior.
@@ -7375,8 +7384,9 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
APSInt TrueResult = (LHS - RHS) / ElemSize;
APSInt Result = TrueResult.trunc(Info.Ctx.getIntWidth(E->getType()));
- if (Result.extend(65) != TrueResult)
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, TrueResult, E->getType());
+ if (Result.extend(65) != TrueResult &&
+ !HandleOverflow(Info, E, TrueResult, E->getType()))
+ return false;
return Success(Result, E);
}
@@ -7662,9 +7672,10 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitUnaryOperator(const UnaryOperator *E) {
return false;
if (!Result.isInt()) return Error(E);
const APSInt &Value = Result.getInt();
- if (Value.isSigned() && Value.isMinSignedValue())
- HandleOverflow(Info, E, -Value.extend(Value.getBitWidth() + 1),
- E->getType());
+ if (Value.isSigned() && Value.isMinSignedValue() &&
+ !HandleOverflow(Info, E, -Value.extend(Value.getBitWidth() + 1),
+ E->getType()))
+ return false;
return Success(-Value, E);
}
case UO_Not: {
@@ -8863,7 +8874,9 @@ bool Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(APValue &Value, const ASTContext &Ctx,
Expr::EvalStatus EStatus;
EStatus.Diag = &Notes;
- EvalInfo InitInfo(Ctx, EStatus, EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold);
+ EvalInfo InitInfo(Ctx, EStatus, VD->isConstexpr()
+ ? EvalInfo::EM_ConstantExpression
+ : EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold);
InitInfo.setEvaluatingDecl(VD, Value);
LValue LVal;
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud