Fix our semantic analysis of

  unqualified-id '('

in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.

As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.

Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like

  operator+(x, y)

llvm-svn: 63733

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
index b21b4136898..dbc811a68b1 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ Stmt::child_iterator CXXNewExpr::child_end() {
 Stmt::child_iterator CXXDeleteExpr::child_begin() { return &Argument; }
 Stmt::child_iterator CXXDeleteExpr::child_end() { return &Argument+1; }
 
-// CXXDependentNameExpr
-Stmt::child_iterator CXXDependentNameExpr::child_begin() { 
+// UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr
+Stmt::child_iterator UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr::child_begin() { 
   return child_iterator(); 
 }
-Stmt::child_iterator CXXDependentNameExpr::child_end() {
+Stmt::child_iterator UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr::child_end() {
   return child_iterator();
 }