summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com>2015-09-10 10:07:11 +0000
committerAlexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com>2015-09-10 10:07:11 +0000
commit11d4d6446e097ef12ee106446486276e8a8c79b0 (patch)
treefbc3710e85328ba618c458b545bccd74fd7a8049 /clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp
parent1d7f0faf93eefa7624b611cd0636a2f62f44efe9 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-11d4d6446e097ef12ee106446486276e8a8c79b0.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-11d4d6446e097ef12ee106446486276e8a8c79b0.zip
[clang-tidy] Add inconsistent declaration parameter name check
This is first of series of patches, porting code from my project colobot-lint, as I mentioned recently in cfe-dev mailing list. This patch adds a new check in readability module: readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name. I also added appropriate testcases and documentation. I chose readability module, as it seems it is the best place for it. I think I followed the rules of LLVM coding guideline, but I may have missed something, as I usually use other code formatting style. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12462 Patch by Piotr Dziwinski! llvm-svn: 247261
Diffstat (limited to 'clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp188
1 files changed, 188 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f631317ff43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+// RUN: %python %S/check_clang_tidy.py %s readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name %t
+
+void consistentFunction(int a, int b, int c);
+void consistentFunction(int a, int b, int c);
+void consistentFunction(int a, int b, int /*c*/);
+void consistentFunction(int /*c*/, int /*c*/, int /*c*/);
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: warning: function 'inconsistentFunction' has 2 other declarations with different parameter names [readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name]
+void inconsistentFunction(int a, int b, int c);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:6: note: the 1st inconsistent declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('d', 'e', 'f'), in the other declaration: ('a', 'b', 'c')
+void inconsistentFunction(int d, int e, int f);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:6: note: the 2nd inconsistent declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('x', 'y', 'z'), in the other declaration: ('a', 'b', 'c')
+void inconsistentFunction(int x, int y, int z);
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:6: warning: function 'inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition' has a definition with different parameter names [readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+9]]:6: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('c')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition(int c);
+void inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition(int a);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:6: warning: function 'inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:6: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in definition: ('c')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition(int c);
+void inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition(int b);
+void inconsistentFunctionWithVisibleDefinition(int c) { c; }
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function 'inconsidentFunctionWithUnreferencedParameterInDefinition' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+void inconsidentFunctionWithUnreferencedParameterInDefinition(int a);
+void inconsidentFunctionWithUnreferencedParameterInDefinition(int b) {}
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+struct Struct {
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:8: warning: function 'Struct::inconsistentFunction' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+6]]:14: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:8: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void inconsistentFunction(int b);
+ void inconsistentFunction(int a);
+};
+
+void Struct::inconsistentFunction(int b) { b = 0; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+struct SpecialFunctions {
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:3: warning: function 'SpecialFunctions::SpecialFunctions' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+12]]:19: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:3: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: SpecialFunctions(int b);
+ SpecialFunctions(int a);
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:21: warning: function 'SpecialFunctions::operator=' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+8]]:37: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:21: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: SpecialFunctions& operator=(const SpecialFunctions& b);
+ SpecialFunctions& operator=(const SpecialFunctions& a);
+};
+
+SpecialFunctions::SpecialFunctions(int b) { b; }
+
+SpecialFunctions& SpecialFunctions::operator=(const SpecialFunctions& b) { b; return *this; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+5]]:6: warning: function 'templateFunctionWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+7]]:6: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void templateFunctionWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T b);
+template<typename T>
+void templateFunctionWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T a);
+
+template<typename T>
+void templateFunctionWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T b) { b; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<typename T>
+void templateFunctionWithSpecializations(T a) { a; }
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function template specialization 'templateFunctionWithSpecializations<int>' has a primary template declaration with different parameter names [readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:6: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void templateFunctionWithSpecializations(int b) { b; }
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function template specialization 'templateFunctionWithSpecializations<float>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-10]]:6: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('c'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void templateFunctionWithSpecializations(float c) { c; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<typename T>
+void templateFunctionWithoutDefinitionButWithSpecialization(T a);
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function template specialization 'templateFunctionWithoutDefinitionButWithSpecialization<int>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:6: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void templateFunctionWithoutDefinitionButWithSpecialization(int b) { b; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<typename T>
+void templateFunctionWithSeparateSpecializationDeclarationAndDefinition(T a);
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function template specialization 'templateFunctionWithSeparateSpecializationDeclarationAndDefinition<int>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:6: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void templateFunctionWithSeparateSpecializationDeclarationAndDefinition(int b);
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:6: warning: function template specialization 'templateFunctionWithSeparateSpecializationDeclarationAndDefinition<int>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-10]]:6: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: note: differing parameters are named here: ('c'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void templateFunctionWithSeparateSpecializationDeclarationAndDefinition(int c) { c; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<typename T>
+class ClassTemplate
+{
+public:
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:10: warning: function 'ClassTemplate::functionInClassTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+7]]:24: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:10: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void functionInClassTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(int b);
+ void functionInClassTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(int a);
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+void ClassTemplate<T>::functionInClassTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(int b) { b; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+class Class
+{
+public:
+ template<typename T>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+4]]:8: warning: function 'Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition' has a definition
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+12]]:13: note: the definition seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:8: note: differing parameters are named here: ('a'), in definition: ('b')
+// CHECK-FIXES: void memberFunctionTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T b);
+ void memberFunctionTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T a);
+
+ template<typename T>
+ void memberFunctionTemplateWithSpecializations(T a) { a; }
+};
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<typename T>
+void Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSeparateDeclarationAndDefinition(T b) { b; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:13: warning: function template specialization 'Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSpecializations<int>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-12]]:8: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:13: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSpecializations(int b) { b; }
+
+template<>
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+3]]:13: warning: function template specialization 'Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSpecializations<float>' has a primary template
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-18]]:8: note: the primary template declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:13: note: differing parameters are named here: ('c'), in primary template declaration: ('a')
+void Class::memberFunctionTemplateWithSpecializations(float c) { c; }
+
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+#define DECLARE_FUNCTION_WITH_PARAM_NAME(function_name, param_name) \
+ void function_name(int param_name)
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:34: warning: function 'macroFunction' has 1 other declaration with different parameter names [readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name]
+DECLARE_FUNCTION_WITH_PARAM_NAME(macroFunction, a);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:34: note: the 1st inconsistent declaration seen here
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:34: note: differing parameters are named here: ('b'), in the other declaration: ('a')
+DECLARE_FUNCTION_WITH_PARAM_NAME(macroFunction, b);
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud