diff options
author | Jonas Toth <jonas.toth@gmail.com> | 2017-09-12 18:35:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonas Toth <jonas.toth@gmail.com> | 2017-09-12 18:35:54 +0000 |
commit | 8bfdc0b1cc244c45af45d13ef68d218e983ae35a (patch) | |
tree | bed4e594a15f8104aa8c56b3eb6ccbbff5449e18 /clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp | |
parent | 2176a9f2a3d2e6ef4c607c241dd1d916391e0c4c (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-8bfdc0b1cc244c45af45d13ef68d218e983ae35a.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-8bfdc0b1cc244c45af45d13ef68d218e983ae35a.zip |
[clang-tidy] Revert Implement type-based check for gsl::owner
This should unbreak the buildbot for visual studio 2015 for now.
llvm-svn: 313059
Diffstat (limited to 'clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp | 388 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 388 deletions
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp deleted file mode 100644 index 542dfd720ff..00000000000 --- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory.cpp +++ /dev/null @@ -1,388 +0,0 @@ -// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory %t - -namespace gsl { -template <class T> -using owner = T; -} // namespace gsl - -template <typename T> -class unique_ptr { -public: - unique_ptr(gsl::owner<T> resource) : memory(resource) {} - unique_ptr(const unique_ptr<T> &) = default; - - ~unique_ptr() { delete memory; } - -private: - gsl::owner<T> memory; -}; - -void takes_owner(gsl::owner<int *> owned_int) { -} - -void takes_pointer(int *unowned_int) { -} - -void takes_owner_and_more(int some_int, gsl::owner<int *> owned_int, float f) { -} - -template <typename T> -void takes_templated_owner(gsl::owner<T> owned_T) { -} - -gsl::owner<int *> returns_owner1() { return gsl::owner<int *>(new int(42)); } // Ok -gsl::owner<int *> returns_owner2() { return new int(42); } // Ok - -int *returns_no_owner1() { return nullptr; } -int *returns_no_owner2() { - return new int(42); - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: returning a newly created resource of type 'int *' or 'gsl::owner<>' from a function whose return type is not 'gsl::owner<>' -} -int *returns_no_owner3() { - int *should_be_owner = new int(42); - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - return should_be_owner; -} -int *returns_no_owner4() { - gsl::owner<int *> owner = new int(42); - return owner; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: returning a newly created resource of type 'int *' or 'gsl::owner<>' from a function whose return type is not 'gsl::owner<>' -} - -unique_ptr<int *> returns_no_owner5() { - return unique_ptr<int *>(new int(42)); // Ok -} - -/// FIXME: CSA finds it, but the report is misleading. Ownersemantics can catch this -/// by flow analysis similar to misc-use-after-move. -void csa_not_finding_leak() { - gsl::owner<int *> o1 = new int(42); // Ok - - gsl::owner<int *> o2 = o1; // Ok - o2 = new int(45); // conceptual leak, the memory from o1 is now leaked, since its considered moved in the guidelines - - delete o2; - // actual leak occurs here, its found, but mixed - delete o1; -} - -void test_assignment_and_initialization() { - int stack_int1 = 15; - int stack_int2; - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int1 = &stack_int1; // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int2; - owned_int2 = &stack_int2; // BAD since no owner, bad since uninitialized - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int3 = new int(42); // Good - owned_int3 = nullptr; // Good - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int4(nullptr); // Ok - owned_int4 = new int(42); // Good - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int5 = owned_int3; // Good - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int6{nullptr}; // Ok - owned_int6 = owned_int4; // Good - - // FIXME:, flow analysis for the case of reassignment. Value must be released before - owned_int6 = owned_int3; // BAD, because reassignment without resource release - - auto owned_int7 = returns_owner1(); // Bad, since type deduction eliminates the owner wrapper - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: note: type deduction did not result in an owner - - const auto owned_int8 = returns_owner2(); // Bad, since type deduction eliminates the owner wrapper - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *const' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: note: type deduction did not result in an owner - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int9 = returns_owner1(); // Ok - int *unowned_int3 = returns_owner1(); // Bad - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int10; - owned_int10 = returns_owner1(); // Ok - - int *unowned_int4; - unowned_int4 = returns_owner1(); // Bad - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: assigning newly created 'gsl::owner<>' to non-owner 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int11 = returns_no_owner1(); // Bad since no owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int12; - owned_int12 = returns_no_owner1(); // Bad since no owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - int *unowned_int5 = returns_no_owner1(); // Ok - int *unowned_int6; - unowned_int6 = returns_no_owner1(); // Ok - - int *unowned_int7 = new int(42); // Bad, since resource not assigned to an owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - - int *unowned_int8; - unowned_int8 = new int(42); - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: assigning newly created 'gsl::owner<>' to non-owner 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int13 = nullptr; // Ok -} - -void test_deletion() { - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int1 = new int(42); - delete owned_int1; // Good - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int2 = new int[42]; - delete[] owned_int2; // Good - - int *unowned_int1 = new int(42); // BAD, since new creates and owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - delete unowned_int1; // BAD, since no owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: deleting a pointer through a type that is not marked 'gsl::owner<>'; consider using a smart pointer instead - - int *unowned_int2 = new int[42]; // BAD, since new creates and owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - delete[] unowned_int2; // BAD since no owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: deleting a pointer through a type that is not marked 'gsl::owner<>'; consider using a smart pointer instead - - delete new int(42); // Technically ok, but stupid - delete[] new int[42]; // Technically ok, but stupid -} - -void test_owner_function_calls() { - int stack_int = 42; - int *unowned_int1 = &stack_int; - takes_owner(&stack_int); // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - takes_owner(unowned_int1); // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int1 = new int(42); - takes_owner(owned_int1); // Ok - - takes_owner_and_more(42, &stack_int, 42.0f); // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:28: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - takes_owner_and_more(42, unowned_int1, 42.0f); // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:28: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - takes_owner_and_more(42, new int(42), 42.0f); // Ok, since new is consumed by owner - takes_owner_and_more(42, owned_int1, 42.0f); // Ok, since owner as argument - - takes_templated_owner(owned_int1); // Ok - takes_templated_owner(new int(42)); // Ok - takes_templated_owner(unowned_int1); // Bad - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:25: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - takes_owner(returns_owner1()); // Ok - takes_owner(returns_no_owner1()); // BAD - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: expected argument of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' -} - -void test_unowned_function_calls() { - int stack_int = 42; - int *unowned_int1 = &stack_int; - gsl::owner<int *> owned_int1 = new int(42); - - takes_pointer(&stack_int); // Ok - takes_pointer(unowned_int1); // Ok - takes_pointer(owned_int1); // Ok - takes_pointer(new int(42)); // Bad, since new creates and owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:17: warning: initializing non-owner argument of type 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - - takes_pointer(returns_owner1()); // Bad - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:17: warning: initializing non-owner argument of type 'int *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - - takes_pointer(returns_no_owner1()); // Ok -} - -// FIXME: Typedefing owner<> to something else does not work. -// This might be necessary for code already having a similar typedef like owner<> and -// replacing it with owner<>. This might be the same problem as with templates. -// The canonical type will ignore the owner<> alias, since its a typedef as well. -// -// Check, if owners hidden by typedef are handled the same as 'obvious' owners. -#if 0 -using heap_int = gsl::owner<int *>; -typedef gsl::owner<float *> heap_float; - -// This tests only a subset, assuming that the check will either see through the -// typedef or not (it doesn't!). -void test_typedefed_values() { - // Modern typedef. - int StackInt1 = 42; - heap_int HeapInt1 = &StackInt1; - // CHECK MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - //FIXME: Typedef not considered correctly here. - // heap_int HeapInt2 = new int(42); // Ok - takes_pointer(HeapInt1); // Ok - takes_owner(HeapInt1); // Ok - - // Traditional typedef. - float StackFloat1 = 42.0f; - heap_float HeapFloat1 = &StackFloat1; - // CHECK MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'float *' - - //FIXME: Typedef not considered correctly here. - // heap_float HeapFloat2 = new float(42.0f); - HeapFloat2 = HeapFloat1; // Ok -} -#endif - -struct ArbitraryClass {}; -struct ClassWithOwner { // Does not define destructor, necessary with owner - ClassWithOwner() : owner_var(nullptr) {} // Ok - - ClassWithOwner(ArbitraryClass &other) : owner_var(&other) {} - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:43: warning: expected initialization of owner member variable with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'ArbitraryClass *' - - ClassWithOwner(gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *> other) : owner_var(other) {} // Ok - - ClassWithOwner(gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *> data, int /* unused */) { // Ok - owner_var = data; // Ok - } - - ClassWithOwner(ArbitraryClass *bad_data, int /* unused */, int /* unused */) { - owner_var = bad_data; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'ArbitraryClass *' - } - - ClassWithOwner(ClassWithOwner &&other) : owner_var{other.owner_var} {} // Ok - - ClassWithOwner &operator=(ClassWithOwner &&other) { - owner_var = other.owner_var; // Ok - return *this; - } - - // Returning means, that the owner is "moved", so the class should not access this - // variable anymore after this method gets called. - gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *> buggy_but_returns_owner() { return owner_var; } - - gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *> owner_var; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: member variable of type 'gsl::owner<>' requires the class 'ClassWithOwner' to implement a destructor to release the owned resource -}; - -class DefaultedDestructor { // Bad since default constructor with owner - ~DefaultedDestructor() = default; // Bad, since will not destroy the owner - gsl::owner<int *> Owner; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: member variable of type 'gsl::owner<>' requires the class 'DefaultedDestructor' to implement a destructor to release the owned resource -}; - -struct DeletedDestructor { - ~DeletedDestructor() = delete; - gsl::owner<int *> Owner; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: member variable of type 'gsl::owner<>' requires the class 'DeletedDestructor' to implement a destructor to release the owned resource -}; - -void test_class_with_owner() { - ArbitraryClass A; - ClassWithOwner C1; // Ok - ClassWithOwner C2{A}; // Bad, since the owner would be initialized with an non-owner, but catched in the class - ClassWithOwner C3{gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *>(new ArbitraryClass)}; // Ok - - const auto Owner1 = C3.buggy_but_returns_owner(); // BAD, deduces Owner1 to ArbitraryClass *const - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'ArbitraryClass *const' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: note: type deduction did not result in an owner - - auto Owner2 = C2.buggy_but_returns_owner(); // BAD, deduces Owner2 to ArbitraryClass * - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: initializing non-owner 'ArbitraryClass *' with a newly created 'gsl::owner<>' - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: note: type deduction did not result in an owner - - Owner2 = &A; // Ok, since type deduction did NOT result in owner<int*> - - gsl::owner<ArbitraryClass *> Owner3 = C1.buggy_but_returns_owner(); // Ok, still an owner - Owner3 = &A; // Bad, since assignment of non-owner to owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected assignment source to be of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'ArbitraryClass *' -} - -template <typename T> -struct HeapArray { // Ok, since destructor with owner - HeapArray() : _data(nullptr), size(0) {} // Ok - HeapArray(int size) : _data(new int[size]), size(size) {} // Ok - HeapArray(int size, T val) { - _data = new int[size]; // Ok - size = size; - for (auto i = 0u; i < size; ++i) - _data[i] = val; // Ok - } - HeapArray(int size, T val, int *problematic) : _data{problematic}, size(size) {} // Bad - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:50: warning: expected initialization of owner member variable with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'void' - // FIXME: void is incorrect type, probably wrong thing matched - - HeapArray(HeapArray &&other) : _data(other._data), size(other.size) { // Ok - other._data = nullptr; // Ok - other.size = 0; - } - - HeapArray<T> &operator=(HeapArray<T> &&other) { - _data = other._data; // Ok, NOLINT warning here about bad types, why? - size = other.size; - return *this; - } - - ~HeapArray() { delete[] _data; } // Ok - - T *data() { return _data; } // Ok NOLINT, because it "looks" like a factory - - gsl::owner<T *> _data; - unsigned int size; -}; - -void test_inner_template() { - HeapArray<int> Array1; - HeapArray<int> Array2(100); - HeapArray<int> Array3(100, 0); - - Array1 = static_cast<HeapArray<int> &&>(Array2); - HeapArray<int> Array4(static_cast<HeapArray<int> &&>(Array3)); - - int *NonOwningPtr = Array1.data(); // Ok - gsl::owner<int *> OwningPtr = Array1.data(); // Bad, since it does not return the owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' -} - -// FIXME: Typededuction removes the owner - wrapper, therefore gsl::owner can not be used -// with Template classes like this. Is there a walkaround? -template <typename T> -struct TemplateValue { - TemplateValue() = default; - TemplateValue(T t) : val{t} {} - - void setVal(const T &t) { val = t; } - const T getVal() const { return val; } - - T val; -}; - -// FIXME: Same typededcution problems -template <typename T> -void template_function(T t) { - gsl::owner<int *> owner_t = t; // Probably bad, since type deduction still wrong - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'T' - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' -} - -// FIXME: Same typededcution problems -void test_templates() { - int stack_int = 42; - int *stack_ptr1 = &stack_int; - - TemplateValue<gsl::owner<int *>> Owner0; // Ok, T should be owner, but is int* - - TemplateValue<gsl::owner<int *>> Owner1(new int(42)); // Ok, T should be owner, but is int* - Owner1.setVal(&stack_int); // Bad since non-owner assignment - Owner1.setVal(stack_ptr1); // Bad since non-owner assignment - //Owner1.setVal(new int(42)); // Ok, but since type deduction is wrong, this one is considered harmful - - int *stack_ptr2 = Owner1.getVal(); // Bad, initializing non-owner with owner - - TemplateValue<int *> NonOwner1(new int(42)); // Bad, T is int *, hence dynamic memory to non-owner - gsl::owner<int *> IntOwner1 = NonOwner1.getVal(); // Bad, since owner initialized with non-owner - // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: expected initialization with value of type 'gsl::owner<>'; got 'int *' - - template_function(IntOwner1); // Ok, but not actually ok, since type deduction removes owner - template_function(stack_ptr1); // Bad, but type deduction gets it wrong -} |