[clang-tidy] Handle bitfields in cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init

Summary:
Unnamed bitfields cannot be initialized.
Bitfields cannot be in-class initialized.

Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman

Subscribers: Prazek, nemanjai, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26119

llvm-svn: 285752

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp
index 272e2dad1be..a5c26482e4d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ void ProTypeMemberInitCheck::checkMissingMemberInitializer(
     if (!F->hasInClassInitializer() &&
         utils::type_traits::isTriviallyDefaultConstructible(F->getType(),
                                                             Context) &&
-        !isEmpty(Context, F->getType()))
+        !isEmpty(Context, F->getType()) && !F->isUnnamedBitfield())
       FieldsToInit.insert(F);
   });
   if (FieldsToInit.empty())
@@ -407,7 +407,9 @@ void ProTypeMemberInitCheck::checkMissingMemberInitializer(
   SmallPtrSet<const FieldDecl *, 16> FieldsToFix;
   forEachField(ClassDecl, FieldsToInit, true, [&](const FieldDecl *F) {
     // Don't suggest fixes for enums because we don't know a good default.
-    if (!F->getType()->isEnumeralType())
+    // Don't suggest fixes for bitfields because in-class initialization is not
+    // possible.
+    if (!F->getType()->isEnumeralType() && !F->isBitField())
       FieldsToFix.insert(F);
   });
   if (FieldsToFix.empty())