diff options
author | Serge Pavlov <sepavloff@gmail.com> | 2017-06-14 10:07:02 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Serge Pavlov <sepavloff@gmail.com> | 2017-06-14 10:07:02 +0000 |
commit | c73c81be5c8fdb8d27acb87623c252b665ac3b42 (patch) | |
tree | aaa2b2909f138b50ba7b9d5adc2601eedc952d22 | |
parent | 0c29ef1b8055a504ff0ca6a610eb47f2637235e0 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-c73c81be5c8fdb8d27acb87623c252b665ac3b42.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-c73c81be5c8fdb8d27acb87623c252b665ac3b42.zip |
Function with unparsed body is a definition
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
-rw-r--r-- | clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/SemaCXX/friend2.cpp | 12 |
6 files changed, 23 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h b/clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h index 9d49bac26a8..94cb66fd2bf 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h +++ b/clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h @@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@ public: /// bool isThisDeclarationADefinition() const { return IsDeleted || IsDefaulted || Body || IsLateTemplateParsed || - hasDefiningAttr(); + WillHaveBody || hasDefiningAttr(); } /// doesThisDeclarationHaveABody - Returns whether this specific diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp index b938ac387c4..cac5f682275 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp @@ -629,12 +629,6 @@ static bool IsKnownEmitted(Sema &S, FunctionDecl *FD) { // emitted, because (say) the definition could include "inline". FunctionDecl *Def = FD->getDefinition(); - // We may currently be parsing the body of FD, in which case - // FD->getDefinition() will be null, but we still want to treat FD as though - // it's a definition. - if (!Def && FD->willHaveBody()) - Def = FD; - if (Def && !isDiscardableGVALinkage(S.getASTContext().GetGVALinkageForFunction(Def))) return true; diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index cba220daf77..9763eb5611a 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -12218,6 +12218,7 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnFinishFunctionBody(Decl *dcl, Stmt *Body, if (FD) { FD->setBody(Body); + FD->setWillHaveBody(false); if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus14) { if (!FD->isInvalidDecl() && Body && !FD->isDependentContext() && diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp index 844299bb87c..0b46e15bb0a 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp @@ -13878,6 +13878,9 @@ void Sema::SetDeclDeleted(Decl *Dcl, SourceLocation DelLoc) { return; } + // Deleted function does not have a body. + Fn->setWillHaveBody(false); + if (const FunctionDecl *Prev = Fn->getPreviousDecl()) { // Don't consider the implicit declaration we generate for explicit // specializations. FIXME: Do not generate these implicit declarations. diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp index 148ce24293a..11c6c519b61 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp @@ -1782,6 +1782,12 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl *D, Previous.clear(); } + if (isFriend) { + Function->setObjectOfFriendDecl(); + if (FunctionTemplate) + FunctionTemplate->setObjectOfFriendDecl(); + } + SemaRef.CheckFunctionDeclaration(/*Scope*/ nullptr, Function, Previous, isExplicitSpecialization); @@ -1792,7 +1798,6 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl *D, // If the original function was part of a friend declaration, // inherit its namespace state and add it to the owner. if (isFriend) { - PrincipalDecl->setObjectOfFriendDecl(); DC->makeDeclVisibleInContext(PrincipalDecl); bool QueuedInstantiation = false; diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/friend2.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/friend2.cpp index 347af0d61b1..d5087df5d8d 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/friend2.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/friend2.cpp @@ -170,3 +170,15 @@ struct Test { template class Test<int>; } + +namespace pr14785 { +template<typename T> +struct Somewhat { + void internal() const { } + friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {} // expected-error{{redefinition of 'operator+'}} +}; + +void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { // expected-note {{previous definition is here}} + x.internal(); // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'pr14785::Somewhat<char>' requested here}} +} +} |