Coding standards: fix typo: '= deleted' -> '= delete'.

llvm-svn: 164126

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst b/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst
index bc58f57cb74..4d16e2a9bd6 100644
--- a/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst
+++ b/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst
@@ -826,14 +826,14 @@ unimplemented copy constructor and copy assignment operator and make them
 private. This would give a compiler error for accessing a private method or a
 linker error because it wasn't implemented.
 
-With C++11, we can mark methods that won't be implemented with ``= deleted``.
+With C++11, we can mark methods that won't be implemented with ``= delete``.
 This will trigger a much better error message and tell the compiler that the
 method will never be implemented. This enables other checks like
 ``-Wunused-private-field`` to run correctly on classes that contain these
 methods.
 
 To maintain compatibility with C++03, ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` should be used
-which will expand to ``= deleted`` if the compiler supports it. These methods
+which will expand to ``= delete`` if the compiler supports it. These methods
 should still be declared private. Example of the uncopyable pattern:
 
 .. code-block:: c++