summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>2017-07-15 22:42:17 +0000
committerTobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>2017-07-15 22:42:17 +0000
commita3aa423fc34b2cb02cf9a2bf873d508f24d2f9a1 (patch)
treec87acd10af16e924648140deef052f3d299f8f18
parent0b4b4e388d551b542c2a09a17fccb77f40498700 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-a3aa423fc34b2cb02cf9a2bf873d508f24d2f9a1.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-a3aa423fc34b2cb02cf9a2bf873d508f24d2f9a1.zip
[ScopDetection] If a loop is not part of a scop, none of it backedges can be
This patch makes sure that in case a loop is not fully contained within a region that later forms a SCoP, none of the loop backedges are allowed to be part of the region. We currently do not support the situation where only some of a loops backedges are part of a scop. Today, this can break both scop modeling and code generation. One such breaking test case is for example test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll, where we totally forgot to code generate some of the backedges. Fortunately, it is commonly not necessary to support these partial loops, it is way more common that either no backedge is included in a region or all loop backedge are included. This fixes a recent miscompile in MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset which was exposed after r306477. llvm-svn: 308113
-rw-r--r--polly/include/polly/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.h29
-rw-r--r--polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp16
-rw-r--r--polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp20
-rw-r--r--polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/loop_partially_in_scop.ll49
-rw-r--r--polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll24
-rw-r--r--polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop.ll34
6 files changed, 120 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/polly/include/polly/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.h b/polly/include/polly/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.h
index 4dfd0fc8d82..f9b28f561e5 100644
--- a/polly/include/polly/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.h
+++ b/polly/include/polly/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.h
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ enum class RejectReasonKind {
LoopBound,
LoopHasNoExit,
+ LoopOnlySomeLatches,
FuncCall,
NonSimpleMemoryAccess,
@@ -566,6 +567,34 @@ public:
};
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+/// Captures errors when not all loop latches are part of the scop.
+class ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches : public RejectReason {
+ //===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+ /// The loop for which not all loop latches are part of the scop.
+ Loop *L;
+
+ const DebugLoc Loc;
+
+public:
+ ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches(Loop *L)
+ : RejectReason(RejectReasonKind::LoopOnlySomeLatches), L(L),
+ Loc(L->getStartLoc()) {}
+
+ /// @name LLVM-RTTI interface
+ //@{
+ static bool classof(const RejectReason *RR);
+ //@}
+
+ /// @name RejectReason interface
+ //@{
+ virtual std::string getMessage() const override;
+ virtual const DebugLoc &getDebugLoc() const override;
+ virtual std::string getEndUserMessage() const override;
+ //@}
+};
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// Captures errors with non-side-effect-known function calls.
class ReportFuncCall : public RejectReason {
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp
index c56d2cc4adb..27dfc930db8 100644
--- a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp
+++ b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp
@@ -1402,9 +1402,19 @@ bool ScopDetection::allBlocksValid(DetectionContext &Context) const {
for (const BasicBlock *BB : CurRegion.blocks()) {
Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(BB);
- if (L && L->getHeader() == BB && CurRegion.contains(L) &&
- (!isValidLoop(L, Context) && !KeepGoing))
- return false;
+ if (L && L->getHeader() == BB) {
+ if (CurRegion.contains(L)) {
+ if (!isValidLoop(L, Context) && !KeepGoing)
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 1> Latches;
+ L->getLoopLatches(Latches);
+ for (BasicBlock *Latch : Latches)
+ if (CurRegion.contains(Latch))
+ return invalid<ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches>(Context, /*Assert=*/true,
+ L);
+ }
+ }
}
for (BasicBlock *BB : CurRegion.blocks()) {
diff --git a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp
index ca70018e8fb..ffc259f991a 100644
--- a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp
+++ b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ llvm::Statistic RejectStatistics[] = {
SCOP_STAT(LastAffFunc, ""),
SCOP_STAT(LoopBound, "Uncomputable loop bounds"),
SCOP_STAT(LoopHasNoExit, "Loop without exit"),
+ SCOP_STAT(LoopOnlySomeLatches, "Not all loop latches in scop"),
SCOP_STAT(FuncCall, "Function call with side effects"),
SCOP_STAT(NonSimpleMemoryAccess,
"Compilated access semantics (volatile or atomic)"),
@@ -393,6 +394,25 @@ std::string ReportLoopHasNoExit::getEndUserMessage() const {
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches
+
+std::string ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches::getMessage() const {
+ return "Not all latches of loop " + L->getHeader()->getName() +
+ " part of scop.";
+}
+
+bool ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches::classof(const RejectReason *RR) {
+ return RR->getKind() == RejectReasonKind::LoopHasNoExit;
+}
+
+const DebugLoc &ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches::getDebugLoc() const { return Loc; }
+
+std::string ReportLoopOnlySomeLatches::getEndUserMessage() const {
+ return "Loop cannot be handled because not all latches are part of loop "
+ "region.";
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ReportFuncCall.
ReportFuncCall::ReportFuncCall(Instruction *Inst)
diff --git a/polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/loop_partially_in_scop.ll b/polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/loop_partially_in_scop.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index 3cf7f1e73cb..00000000000
--- a/polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/loop_partially_in_scop.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: opt %loadPolly -S -polly-codegen < %s | FileCheck %s
-;
-; Verify we do not crash for this test case and additionally check the code
-; that we generate for the %tmp PHI node in the non-affine region. This code
-; is difficult to generate as some incoming edges are from basic blocks
-; from within the region and others from basic blocks from outside of the
-; non-affine region. As visible in the CHECK lines, the code we generate
-; currently loads from the PHI twice in %polly.stmt.bb2.entry, which is
-; something we should avoid.
-;
-; CHECK: polly.start
-
-; CHECK: polly.stmt.bb2.entry: ; preds = %polly.start
-; CHECK-NEXT: %tmp.phiops.reload = load i32, i32* %tmp.phiops
-; CHECK-NEXT: br label %polly.stmt.bb2
-
-; CHECK: polly.stmt.bb2: ; preds = %polly.stmt.bb2, %polly.stmt.bb2.entry
-; CHECK-NEXT: %polly.tmp = phi i32 [ %tmp.phiops.reload, %polly.stmt.bb2.entry ], [ %p_tmp4, %polly.stmt.bb2 ]
-; CHECK-NEXT: %p_tmp3 = or i32 undef, undef
-; CHECK-NEXT: %p_tmp4 = udiv i32 %p_tmp3, 10
-; CHECK-NEXT: %p_tmp6 = icmp eq i8 undef, 0
-; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %p_tmp6, label %polly.stmt.polly.merge_new_and_old.exit, label %polly.stmt.bb2
-
-target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
-
-define void @baz(i32 %before) {
-bb:
- br label %bb1
-
-bb1: ; preds = %bb
- br label %bb2
-
-bb2: ; preds = %bb8, %bb7, %bb2, %bb1
- %tmp = phi i32 [ %before, %bb1 ], [ 0, %bb8 ], [ %tmp4, %bb7 ], [ %tmp4, %bb2 ]
- %tmp3 = or i32 undef, undef
- %tmp4 = udiv i32 %tmp3, 10
- %tmp5 = trunc i32 undef to i8
- %tmp6 = icmp eq i8 %tmp5, 0
- br i1 %tmp6, label %bb7, label %bb2
-
-bb7: ; preds = %bb2
- br i1 undef, label %bb8, label %bb2
-
-bb8: ; preds = %bb7
- br i1 undef, label %bb9, label %bb2
-
-bb9: ; preds = %bb8
- unreachable
-}
diff --git a/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll b/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2eb039cc2d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+; RUN: opt %loadPolly -analyze -polly-detect \
+; RUN: -pass-remarks-missed="polly-detect" \
+; RUN: < %s 2>&1| FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: remark: <unknown>:0:0: Loop cannot be handled because not all latches are part of loop region.
+
+define void @foo(i8* %str0) {
+if.end32:
+ br label %while.cond
+
+while.cond:
+ %str.1 = phi i8* [%str0, %if.end32], [%incdec.ptr58364, %lor.end], [%incdec.ptr58364, %while.cond]
+ %tmp5 = load i8, i8* %str.1, align 1
+ %.off367 = add i8 %tmp5, -48
+ %tmp6 = icmp ult i8 %.off367, 10
+ %incdec.ptr58364 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %str.1, i64 1
+ br i1 %tmp6, label %while.cond, label %lor.end
+
+lor.end:
+ br i1 false, label %exit, label %while.cond
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
diff --git a/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop.ll b/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..af01cadd91c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/polly/test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+; RUN: opt %loadPolly -analyze -polly-detect \
+; RUN: -pass-remarks-missed="polly-detect" \
+; RUN: < %s 2>&1| FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: remark: <unknown>:0:0: Loop cannot be handled because not all latches are part of loop region.
+; CHECK: remark: <unknown>:0:0: Loop cannot be handled because not all latches are part of loop region.
+
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+
+define void @baz(i32 %before) {
+bb:
+ br label %bb1
+
+bb1: ; preds = %bb
+ br label %bb2
+
+bb2: ; preds = %bb8, %bb7, %bb2, %bb1
+ %tmp = phi i32 [ %before, %bb1 ], [ 0, %bb8 ], [ %tmp4, %bb7 ], [ %tmp4, %bb2 ]
+ %tmp3 = or i32 undef, undef
+ %tmp4 = udiv i32 %tmp3, 10
+ %tmp5 = trunc i32 undef to i8
+ %tmp6 = icmp eq i8 %tmp5, 0
+ br i1 %tmp6, label %bb7, label %bb2
+
+bb7: ; preds = %bb2
+ br i1 undef, label %bb8, label %bb2
+
+bb8: ; preds = %bb7
+ br i1 undef, label %bb9, label %bb2
+
+bb9: ; preds = %bb8
+ unreachable
+}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud