[clang-tidy] When" -fno-exceptions is used", this warning is better to be suppressed.

Summary:  "misc-noexcept-move-constructor" is better not to be issued when "-fno-exceptions" is set.

Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, xazax.hun

Tags: #clang-tools-extra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002

llvm-svn: 304949

2 files changed, 14 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp
index 12a360f4ba7..2fdcf75083f 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ namespace misc {
 void NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
   // Only register the matchers for C++11; the functionality currently does not
   // provide any benefit to other languages, despite being benign.
-  if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11)
+  if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11 || !getLangOpts().CXXExceptions)
     return;
 
   Finder->addMatcher(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/misc-noexcept-move-constructor.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/misc-noexcept-move-constructor.cpp
index b8154ec3af1..4072e3f933b 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/misc-noexcept-move-constructor.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/misc-noexcept-move-constructor.cpp
@@ -1,16 +1,25 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s misc-noexcept-move-constructor %t
+// RUN: clang-tidy %s -checks="-*,misc-noexcept-move-constructor" -- -std=c++11 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EXCEPTIONS \
+// RUN:   -implicit-check-not="{{warning|error}}:"
+// RUN: clang-tidy %s -checks="-*,misc-noexcept-move-constructor" -- -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck %s -allow-empty -check-prefix=CHECK-NONEXCEPTIONS \
+// RUN:   -implicit-check-not="{{warning|error}}:"
+
 
 class A {
   A(A &&);
-  // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: move constructors should be marked noexcept [misc-noexcept-move-constructor]
+  // CHECK-EXCEPTIONS: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: move constructors should be marked noexcept [misc-noexcept-move-constructor]
+  // CHECK-NONEXCEPTIONS-NOT: warning:
   A &operator=(A &&);
-  // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:6: warning: move assignment operators should
+  // CHECK-EXCEPTIONS: :[[@LINE-1]]:6: warning: move assignment operators should
+  // CHECK-NONEXCEPTIONS-NOT: warning:
 };
 
 struct B {
   static constexpr bool kFalse = false;
   B(B &&) noexcept(kFalse);
-  // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:20: warning: noexcept specifier on the move constructor evaluates to 'false' [misc-noexcept-move-constructor]
+  // CHECK-EXCEPTIONS: :[[@LINE-1]]:20: warning: noexcept specifier on the move constructor evaluates to 'false' [misc-noexcept-move-constructor]
+  // CHECK-NONEXCEPTIONS-NOT: warning:
 };
 
 class OK {};