diff options
| author | Ted Kremenek <kremenek@apple.com> | 2008-07-03 22:25:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ted Kremenek <kremenek@apple.com> | 2008-07-03 22:25:27 +0000 |
| commit | 8044046efb8cb48c2de154e3781bf7de99d9ea38 (patch) | |
| tree | 921c591077c4aef4d2f2d934d29725000237ac0c | |
| parent | 9c75ea62d7721b83569e75406b0a80af473a6708 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-8044046efb8cb48c2de154e3781bf7de99d9ea38.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-8044046efb8cb48c2de154e3781bf7de99d9ea38.zip | |
Fix a bug in the dead stores checker reported in the following email:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-July/002157.html
Essentially the observer mechanism in LiveVariables was observing block-level
expressions multiple times, leading to a case where the dead store checker could
see a value as dead when it was really live.
llvm-svn: 53115
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Analysis/LiveVariables.cpp | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Analysis/dead-stores.m | 36 |
2 files changed, 47 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/LiveVariables.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/LiveVariables.cpp index 54e2195a777..8f391dc5618 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Analysis/LiveVariables.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/LiveVariables.cpp @@ -133,15 +133,23 @@ public: }; void TransferFuncs::Visit(Stmt *S) { - if (AD.Observer) - AD.Observer->ObserveStmt(S,AD,LiveState); if (S == getCurrentBlkStmt()) { + + if (AD.Observer) + AD.Observer->ObserveStmt(S,AD,LiveState); + if (getCFG().isBlkExpr(S)) LiveState(S,AD) = Dead; StmtVisitor<TransferFuncs,void>::Visit(S); } - else if (!getCFG().isBlkExpr(S)) + else if (!getCFG().isBlkExpr(S)) { + + if (AD.Observer) + AD.Observer->ObserveStmt(S,AD,LiveState); + StmtVisitor<TransferFuncs,void>::Visit(S); + + } else // For block-level expressions, mark that they are live. LiveState(S,AD) = Alive; diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/dead-stores.m b/clang/test/Analysis/dead-stores.m new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f58c2c135f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/Analysis/dead-stores.m @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// RUN: clang -warn-dead-stores -verify %s + +typedef signed char BOOL; +typedef unsigned int NSUInteger; +typedef struct _NSZone NSZone; +@class NSInvocation, NSMethodSignature, NSCoder, NSString, NSEnumerator; +@protocol NSObject - (BOOL)isEqual:(id)object; @end +@protocol NSCopying - (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone; @end +@protocol NSCoding - (void)encodeWithCoder:(NSCoder *)aCoder; @end +@interface NSObject <NSObject> {} @end +extern id NSAllocateObject(Class aClass, NSUInteger extraBytes, NSZone *zone); +@interface NSValue : NSObject <NSCopying, NSCoding> - (void)getValue:(void *)value; @end +typedef float CGFloat; +typedef struct _NSPoint {} NSRange; +@interface NSValue (NSValueRangeExtensions) + (NSValue *)valueWithRange:(NSRange)range; +- (BOOL)containsObject:(id)anObject; +@end +@class NSURLAuthenticationChallenge; +@interface NSResponder : NSObject <NSCoding> {} @end +@class NSArray, NSDictionary, NSString; +@interface NSObject (NSKeyValueBindingCreation) ++ (void)exposeBinding:(NSString *)binding; +- (NSArray *)exposedBindings; +@end +extern NSString *NSAlignmentBinding; + +// This test case was reported as a false positive due to a bug in the +// LiveVariables <-> DeadStores interplay. We should not flag a warning +// here. The test case was reported in: +// http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-July/002157.html +void DeadStoreTest(NSObject *anObject) { + NSArray *keys; + if ((keys = [anObject exposedBindings]) && // no-warning + ([keys containsObject:@"name"] && [keys containsObject:@"icon"])) {} +} + |

