Write isUInt using template specializations to work around an incorrect MSVC warning.

Summary:
Per D22441, MSVC warns on our old implementation of isUInt<64>.  It sees
uint64_t(1) << 64 and doesn't realize that it's not going to be
executed.  Writing as a template specialization is ugly, but prevents
the warning.

Reviewers: RKSimon

Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22472

llvm-svn: 275909

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
index 5c816ac9df9..42e92203ef9 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
@@ -290,10 +290,21 @@ inline bool isShiftedInt(int64_t x) {
 }
 
 /// isUInt - Checks if an unsigned integer fits into the given bit width.
-template<unsigned N>
-inline bool isUInt(uint64_t x) {
-  static_assert(N > 0, "isUInt<0> doesn't make sense.");
-  return N >= 64 || x < (UINT64_C(1)<<(N));
+///
+/// This is written as two functions rather than as simply
+///
+///   return N >= 64 || X < (UINT64_C(1) << N);
+///
+/// to keep MSVC from (incorrectly) warning on isUInt<64> that we're shifting
+/// left too many places.
+template <unsigned N>
+inline typename std::enable_if<(N < 64), bool>::type isUInt(uint64_t X) {
+  static_assert(N > 0, "isUInt<0> doesn't make sense");
+  return X < (UINT64_C(1) << N);
+}
+template <unsigned N>
+inline typename std::enable_if<N >= 64, bool>::type isUInt(uint64_t X) {
+  return true;
 }
 
 // Template specializations to get better code for common cases.