Allow for nested name specifiers in record declarations.

Now correctly formats:
class A::B {} n;

llvm-svn: 173019

2 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
index 3fd1ff9024e..dffc309a09e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -615,7 +615,9 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseRecord() {
     if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::l_paren)) {
       parseParens();
     }
-    if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::identifier))
+    // The actual identifier can be a nested name specifier.
+    while (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::identifier) ||
+           FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::coloncolon))
       nextToken();
 
     if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::colon)) {
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
index 1d3463ccfd2..3c929a3f532 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -1519,13 +1519,17 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandContextOfRecordTypeKeywords) {
 
   // Actual definitions...
   verifyFormat("struct {} n;");
-  verifyFormat("template <template <class T, class Y>, class Z > class X {} n;");
+  verifyFormat(
+      "template <template <class T, class Y>, class Z > class X {} n;");
   verifyFormat("union Z {\n  int n;\n} x;");
   verifyFormat("class MACRO Z {} n;");
   verifyFormat("class MACRO(X) Z {} n;");
   verifyFormat("class __attribute__(X) Z {} n;");
   verifyFormat("class __declspec(X) Z {} n;");
 
+  // Redefinition from nested context:
+  verifyFormat("class A::B::C {} n;");
+
   // Elaborate types where incorrectly parsing the structural element would
   // break the indent.
   verifyFormat("if (true)\n"