diff options
| author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2011-02-11 21:50:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2011-02-11 21:50:52 +0000 |
| commit | 39b6d87e9f686faf11d736925f0a5d882a3eec89 (patch) | |
| tree | a8a58b186317e6e6a8c325627ae64a1b89db7fab | |
| parent | 1800d823de1ec72d827f12ca340d5ca2d2a81510 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-39b6d87e9f686faf11d736925f0a5d882a3eec89.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-39b6d87e9f686faf11d736925f0a5d882a3eec89.zip | |
attempt to capture recent discussion about overflow and inbounds geps.
llvm-svn: 125412
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html | 28 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html b/llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html index 890d2761ef4..41c45cab12d 100644 --- a/llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html +++ b/llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html @@ -598,13 +598,27 @@ idx3 = (char*) &MyVar + 8 <a name="overflow"><b>What happens if a GEP computation overflows?</b></a> </div> <div class="doc_text"> - <p>If the GEP has the <tt>inbounds</tt> keyword, the result value is - undefined.</p> - - <p>Otherwise, the result value is the result from evaluating the implied - two's complement integer computation. However, since there's no - guarantee of where an object will be allocated in the address space, - such values have limited meaning.</p> + <p>If the GEP lacks the <tt>inbounds</tt> keyword, the value is the result + from evaluating the implied two's complement integer computation. However, + since there's no guarantee of where an object will be allocated in the + address space, such values have limited meaning.</p> + + <p>If the GEP has the <tt>inbounds</tt> keyword, the result value is + undefined (a "<a href="LangRef.html#trapvalues">trap value</a>") if the GEP + overflows (i.e. wraps around the end of the address space).</p> + + <p>As such, there are some ramifications of this for inbounds GEPs: scales + implied by array/vector/pointer indices are always known to be "nsw" since + they are signed values that are scaled by the element size. These values + are also allowed to be negative (e.g. "gep i32 *%P, i32 -1") but the + pointer itself is logically treated as an unsigned value. This means that + GEPs have an asymmetric relation between the pointer base (which is treated + as unsigned) and the offset applied to it (which is treated as signed). The + result of the additions within the offset calculation cannot have signed + overflow, but when applied to the base pointer, there can be signed + overflow. + </p> + </div> |

