diff options
author | Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> | 2016-08-13 23:36:35 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> | 2016-08-13 23:36:35 +0000 |
commit | 2a2f14d7abc76de65cb7c8d4599e69392c3bca7d (patch) | |
tree | 2940a213fd8cd2d8568e51c4593688e6f54bc999 | |
parent | e62aaf2303a11e53741b0dacb6d93f29ee706afc (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-2a2f14d7abc76de65cb7c8d4599e69392c3bca7d.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-2a2f14d7abc76de65cb7c8d4599e69392c3bca7d.zip |
[IRCE] Be resilient in the face of non-simplified loops
Loops containing `indirectbr` may not be in simplified form, even after
running LoopSimplify. Reject then gracefully, instead of tripping an
assert.
llvm-svn: 278611
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/unhandled.ll | 39 |
2 files changed, 42 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp index b3bd1f01232..3f9432e4651 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp @@ -622,9 +622,12 @@ static bool CanBeSMin(ScalarEvolution &SE, const SCEV *S) { Optional<LoopStructure> LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE, BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI, Loop &L, const char *&FailureReason) { - assert(L.isLoopSimplifyForm() && "should follow from addRequired<>"); + if (!L.isLoopSimplifyForm()) + return None; BasicBlock *Latch = L.getLoopLatch(); + assert(Latch && "Simplified loops only have one latch!"); + if (!L.isLoopExiting(Latch)) { FailureReason = "no loop latch"; return None; diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/unhandled.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/unhandled.ll index 0d5ff953aa3..668b318eea0 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/unhandled.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/unhandled.ll @@ -1,11 +1,12 @@ ; RUN: opt -irce-print-changed-loops -irce -S < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s +; CHECK-NOT: constrained Loop at depth + ; Demonstrates that we don't currently handle the general expression ; `A * I + B'. define void @general_affine_expressions(i32 *%arr, i32 *%a_len_ptr, i32 %n, i32 %scale, i32 %offset) { -; CHECK-NOT: constrained Loop at depth entry: %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0 %first.itr.check = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0 @@ -34,4 +35,40 @@ define void @general_affine_expressions(i32 *%arr, i32 *%a_len_ptr, i32 %n, ret void } +; Check that we do the right thing for a loop that could not be +; simplified due to an indirectbr. + +define void @multiple_latches(i32 *%arr, i32 *%a_len_ptr, i32 %n) { + entry: + %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0 + %n.add.1 = add i32 %n, 1 + %first.itr.check = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0 + br i1 %first.itr.check, label %loop, label %exit + + loop: + %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ], [ %idx.next, %continue ] + %idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1 + %idx.next2 = add i32 %idx, 2 + %abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len + br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds, !prof !1 + + in.bounds: + %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx + store i32 0, i32* %addr + %next = icmp slt i32 %idx.next, %n + br i1 %next, label %loop, label %continue + + continue: + %next2 = icmp slt i32 %idx.next, %n.add.1 + %dest = select i1 %next2, i8* blockaddress(@multiple_latches, %loop), i8* blockaddress(@multiple_latches, %exit) + indirectbr i8* %dest, [ label %loop, label %exit] + + out.of.bounds: + ret void + + exit: + ret void +} + !0 = !{i32 0, i32 2147483647} +!1 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 64, i32 4} |