Remove incorrect and poorly tested code for trying to reason about values on default edges of

switches.  Just return the conservatively correct answer.

llvm-svn: 112876

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
index ff98bf97711..b4923f9a717 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
@@ -670,25 +670,11 @@ LVILatticeVal LVIQuery::getEdgeValue(BasicBlock *BBFrom, BasicBlock *BBTo) {
   // If the edge was formed by a switch on the value, then we may know exactly
   // what it is.
   if (SwitchInst *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(BBFrom->getTerminator())) {
-    // If BBTo is the default destination of the switch, we know that it 
-    // doesn't have the same value as any of the cases.
     if (SI->getCondition() == Val) {
+      // We don't know anything in the default case.
       if (SI->getDefaultDest() == BBTo) {
-        const IntegerType *IT = cast<IntegerType>(Val->getType());
-        ConstantRange CR(IT->getBitWidth());
-        
-        for (unsigned i = 1, e = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i) {
-          const APInt CaseVal = SI->getCaseValue(i)->getValue();
-          ConstantRange CaseRange(CaseVal, CaseVal+1);
-          CaseRange = CaseRange.inverse();
-          CR = CR.intersectWith(CaseRange);
-        }
-        
         LVILatticeVal Result;
-        if (CR.isFullSet() || CR.isEmptySet())
-          Result.markOverdefined();
-        else
-          Result.markConstantRange(CR);
+        Result.markOverdefined();
         return Result;
       }