[ValueTracking] Enabling ValueTracking patch by default (recommit). Part 1.

 
The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on non-negative
integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777, r284022). But was disabled by
default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
 
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel
 
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34101
 
Patch by: Olga Chupina <olga.chupina@intel.com>

llvm-svn: 310582

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark-options.c b/clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark-options.c
index a2d717a2422..38dbbfbacce 100644
--- a/clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark-options.c
+++ b/clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark-options.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ double foo(int N) {
 // CHECK: {{.*}}:17:3: remark: loop not vectorized: cannot prove it is safe to reorder memory operations; allow reordering by specifying '#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)' before the loop. If the arrays will always be independent specify '#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)' before the loop or provide the '__restrict__' qualifier with the independent array arguments. Erroneous results will occur if these options are incorrectly applied!
 
 void foo2(int *dw, int *uw, int *A, int *B, int *C, int *D, int N) {
-  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
+  for (long i = 0; i < N; i++) {
     dw[i] = A[i] + B[i - 1] + C[i - 2] + D[i - 3];
     uw[i] = A[i] + B[i + 1] + C[i + 2] + D[i + 3];
   }