1 files changed, 0 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/package/mpd/0005-configure.ac-check-if-libatomic-is-needed.patch b/package/mpd/0005-configure.ac-check-if-libatomic-is-needed.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a9873a741f..0000000000
--- a/package/mpd/0005-configure.ac-check-if-libatomic-is-needed.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-From 8eaf14a17244aaf000b4d19e4fde4a637576939f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
-Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:40:47 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: check if libatomic is needed
-
-The mpd source code uses the C++11 <atomic> functionality, which
-internally is implemented using the __atomic_*() gcc built-ins. On
-certain architectures, the __atomic_*() built-ins are implemented in
-the libatomic library that comes with the rest of the gcc runtime. Due
-to this, code using <atomic> might need to link against libatomic,
-otherwise one hits build issues such as:
-
-GlobalEvents.cxx:(.text._ZN12GlobalEvents4EmitENS_5EventE+0x14): undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_or_4'
-
-on an architecture like SPARC.
-
-To solve this, a configure.ac check is added to know if we need to
-link against libatomic or not.
-
-Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
----
- configure.ac | 2 ++
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
-index 107b45a..8e6fab7 100644
---- a/configure.ac
-+++ b/configure.ac
-@@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ if test x$have_pthread_setname_np = xyes; then
- 	AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PTHREAD_SETNAME_NP, 1, [Is pthread_setname_np() available?])
- fi
- 
-+AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_load_4], [atomic])
-+
- dnl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- dnl Event loop selection
- dnl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- 
-2.6.4
-