summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt')
-rw-r--r--docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt24
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt b/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt
index 473b0e283b..2fdb53079d 100644
--- a/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt
+++ b/docs/manual/faq-troubleshooting.txt
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
// -*- mode:doc; -*-
// vim: set syntax=asciidoc:
-Frequently Asked Questions & Troubleshooting
-============================================
+= Frequently Asked Questions & Troubleshooting
[[faq-boot-hang-after-starting]]
-The boot hangs after 'Starting network...'
-------------------------------------------
+== The boot hangs after 'Starting network...'
If the boot process seems to hang after the following messages
(messages not necessarily exactly similar, depending on the list of
@@ -28,8 +26,7 @@ configuration+, and modify +Port to run a getty (login prompt) on+ and
the correct serial port.
[[faq-no-compiler-on-target]]
-Why is there no compiler on the target?
----------------------------------------
+== Why is there no compiler on the target?
It has been decided that support for the _native compiler on the
target_ would be stopped from the Buildroot-2012.11 release because:
@@ -53,8 +50,7 @@ distribution_ and you should opt for something like:
* ...
[[faq-no-dev-files-on-target]]
-Why are there no development files on the target?
--------------------------------------------------
+== Why are there no development files on the target?
Since there is no compiler available on the target (see
xref:faq-no-compiler-on-target[]), it does not make sense to waste
@@ -64,8 +60,7 @@ Therefore, those files are always removed from the target since the
Buildroot-2012.11 release.
[[faq-no-doc-on-target]]
-Why is there no documentation on the target?
---------------------------------------------
+== Why is there no documentation on the target?
Because Buildroot mostly targets _small_ or _very small_ target
hardware with limited resource onboard (CPU, ram, mass-storage), it
@@ -76,8 +71,7 @@ is not suitable for your purpose, and you should look for a _real
distribution_ (see: xref:faq-no-compiler-on-target[]).
[[faq-why-not-visible-package]]
-Why are some packages not visible in the Buildroot config menu?
----------------------------------------------------------------
+== Why are some packages not visible in the Buildroot config menu?
If a package exists in the Buildroot tree and does not appear in the
config menu, this most likely means that some of the package's
@@ -95,8 +89,7 @@ then you should certainly run a full rebuild (see xref:make-tips[] for
more explanations).
[[faq-why-not-use-target-as-chroot]]
-Why not use the target directory as a chroot directory?
--------------------------------------------------------
+== Why not use the target directory as a chroot directory?
There are plenty of reasons to *not* use the target directory a chroot
one, among these:
@@ -113,8 +106,7 @@ root, then use the tarball image generated in +images/+ and extract it
as root.
[[faq-no-binary-packages]]
-Why doesn't Buildroot generate binary packages (.deb, .ipkg...)?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
+== Why doesn't Buildroot generate binary packages (.deb, .ipkg...)?
One feature that is often discussed on the Buildroot list is the
general topic of "package management". To summarize, the idea
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud