From 8292c9e15c3b069459794a04f5e2cf0d5665ddc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:50:22 +0100 Subject: locking, semaphores: Annotate inner lock as raw There is no reason to have the spin_lock protecting the semaphore preemptible on -rt. Annotate it as a raw_spinlock. In mainline this change documents the low level nature of the lock - otherwise there's no functional difference. Lockdep and Sparse checking will work as usual. ( On rt this also solves lockdep complaining about the rt_mutex.wait_lock being not initialized. ) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/semaphore.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/semaphore.h') diff --git a/include/linux/semaphore.h b/include/linux/semaphore.h index 39fa04966aa8..dc368b8ce215 100644 --- a/include/linux/semaphore.h +++ b/include/linux/semaphore.h @@ -14,14 +14,14 @@ /* Please don't access any members of this structure directly */ struct semaphore { - spinlock_t lock; + raw_spinlock_t lock; unsigned int count; struct list_head wait_list; }; #define __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, n) \ { \ - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((name).lock), \ + .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((name).lock), \ .count = n, \ .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \ } -- cgit v1.2.3