From bd6dc742a4b1945861795a66dc27c65365c5f28e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:59:41 +0100 Subject: AFS: Use patched rxrpc_kernel_send_data() correctly Fix afs_send_simple_reply() to accept a greater-than-zero return value from rxrpc_kernel_send_data() as being a successful return rather than thinking it an error and aborting the call. rxrpc_kernel_send_data() previously returned zero incorrectly when it worked successfully, but has been patched to return the number of bytes it transmitted. Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c index 1b36f45076ad..8ccee9ee1d9d 100644 --- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c +++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len) { struct msghdr msg; struct iovec iov[1]; + int n; _enter(""); @@ -806,22 +807,20 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len) msg.msg_flags = 0; call->state = AFS_CALL_AWAIT_ACK; - switch (rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len)) { - case 0: + n = rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len); + if (n >= 0) { _leave(" [replied]"); return; - - case -ENOMEM: + } + if (n == -ENOMEM) { _debug("oom"); rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(call->rxcall, RX_USER_ABORT); - default: - rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall); - call->rxcall = NULL; - call->type->destructor(call); - afs_free_call(call); - _leave(" [error]"); - return; } + rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall); + call->rxcall = NULL; + call->type->destructor(call); + afs_free_call(call); + _leave(" [error]"); } /* -- cgit v1.2.1