diff options
author | Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> | 2011-01-13 15:47:34 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-01-13 17:32:50 -0800 |
commit | 744ed1442757767ffede5008bb13e0805085902e (patch) | |
tree | 75af93524570b40056f2367059dfa84ba7d90186 /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | d8505dee1a87b8d41b9c4ee1325cd72258226fbc (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-744ed1442757767ffede5008bb13e0805085902e.tar.gz talos-op-linux-744ed1442757767ffede5008bb13e0805085902e.zip |
mm: batch activate_page() to reduce lock contention
The zone->lru_lock is heavily contented in workload where activate_page()
is frequently used. We could do batch activate_page() to reduce the lock
contention. The batched pages will be added into zone list when the pool
is full or page reclaim is trying to drain them.
For example, in a 4 socket 64 CPU system, create a sparse file and 64
processes, processes shared map to the file. Each process read access the
whole file and then exit. The process exit will do unmap_vmas() and cause
a lot of activate_page() call. In such workload, we saw about 58% total
time reduction with below patch. Other workloads with a lot of
activate_page also benefits a lot too.
I tested some microbenchmarks:
case-anon-cow-rand-mt 0.58%
case-anon-cow-rand -3.30%
case-anon-cow-seq-mt -0.51%
case-anon-cow-seq -5.68%
case-anon-r-rand-mt 0.23%
case-anon-r-rand 0.81%
case-anon-r-seq-mt -0.71%
case-anon-r-seq -1.99%
case-anon-rx-rand-mt 2.11%
case-anon-rx-seq-mt 3.46%
case-anon-w-rand-mt -0.03%
case-anon-w-rand -0.50%
case-anon-w-seq-mt -1.08%
case-anon-w-seq -0.12%
case-anon-wx-rand-mt -5.02%
case-anon-wx-seq-mt -1.43%
case-fork 1.65%
case-fork-sleep -0.07%
case-fork-withmem 1.39%
case-hugetlb -0.59%
case-lru-file-mmap-read-mt -0.54%
case-lru-file-mmap-read 0.61%
case-lru-file-mmap-read-rand -2.24%
case-lru-file-readonce -0.64%
case-lru-file-readtwice -11.69%
case-lru-memcg -1.35%
case-mmap-pread-rand-mt 1.88%
case-mmap-pread-rand -15.26%
case-mmap-pread-seq-mt 0.89%
case-mmap-pread-seq -69.72%
case-mmap-xread-rand-mt 0.71%
case-mmap-xread-seq-mt 0.38%
The most significent are:
case-lru-file-readtwice -11.69%
case-mmap-pread-rand -15.26%
case-mmap-pread-seq -69.72%
which use activate_page a lot. others are basically variations because
each run has slightly difference.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 47a50962ce81..99999a9b2b0b 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1271,14 +1271,16 @@ putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); continue; } - SetPageLRU(page); lru = page_lru(page); - add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru); if (is_active_lru(lru)) { int file = is_file_lru(lru); int numpages = hpage_nr_pages(page); reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += numpages; + if (putback_active_lru_page(zone, page)) + continue; } + SetPageLRU(page); + add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru); if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) { spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); __pagevec_release(&pvec); |