diff options
| author | Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> | 2015-04-23 17:17:40 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> | 2015-04-23 15:16:16 -0400 |
| commit | c7757074839f2cd440521482d76ea180d0d4bdac (patch) | |
| tree | b95d52b82aa3aaa30fd48b3d464d5c872ed10991 /fs/nfs | |
| parent | c456aacf3c27b9a3013d4524fdc4bd0bb61fb884 (diff) | |
| download | talos-op-linux-c7757074839f2cd440521482d76ea180d0d4bdac.tar.gz talos-op-linux-c7757074839f2cd440521482d76ea180d0d4bdac.zip | |
fs/nfs: fix new compiler warning about boolean in switch
The brand new GCC 5.1.0 warns by default on using a boolean in the
switch condition. This results in the following warning:
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfs4_proc_get_rootfh':
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:3100:10: warning: switch condition has boolean value [-Wswitch-bool]
switch (auth_probe) {
^
This code was obviously using switch to make use of the fall-through
semantics (without the usual comment, though).
Rewrite that code using if statements to avoid the warning and make
the code a bit more readable on the way.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 60396330044f..addf17d25bea 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -3096,16 +3096,13 @@ int nfs4_proc_get_rootfh(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle, struct nfs_fsinfo *info, bool auth_probe) { - int status; + int status = 0; - switch (auth_probe) { - case false: + if (!auth_probe) status = nfs4_lookup_root(server, fhandle, info); - if (status != -NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC) - break; - default: + + if (auth_probe || status == NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC) status = nfs4_do_find_root_sec(server, fhandle, info); - } if (status == 0) status = nfs4_server_capabilities(server, fhandle); |
