diff options
author | Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> | 2012-09-11 15:16:36 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | 2012-09-14 09:51:54 +0200 |
commit | 55692af5eb587f7592d6c2713e1e0eeaab0f6c31 (patch) | |
tree | 327c88f0a30ce2a7090646fdf41b365bd90e7ee3 /drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c | |
parent | 92d801390c1d0659fd52008336ae9daebdfd7509 (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-55692af5eb587f7592d6c2713e1e0eeaab0f6c31.tar.gz talos-op-linux-55692af5eb587f7592d6c2713e1e0eeaab0f6c31.zip |
mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devices
Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an
irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree
and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs
in the device tree with compatible properties. This will be actively
harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern
for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change
remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do
DT with this particular pattern. There is also a potential fragility if
there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are
omitted from the device tree for some reason.
Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument,
allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their
interrupts. The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has
the domain lookup pushed out into the driver.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c b/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c index 08a57231c25b..f2ff31f3a2f0 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &rtc_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_devs), - &rtc_resources[0], chip->irq_base); + &rtc_resources[0], chip->irq_base, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add rtc subdev\n"); goto out; @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &onkey_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(onkey_devs), - &onkey_resources[0], 0); + &onkey_resources[0], 0, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add onkey subdev\n"); goto out_dev; @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, if (pdata) { ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, ®ulator_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_devs), - ®ulator_resources[0], 0); + ®ulator_resources[0], 0, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add regulator subdev\n"); goto out_dev; @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, if (pdata && pdata->backlight) { ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &backlight_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(backlight_devs), - &backlight_resources[0], 0); + &backlight_resources[0], 0, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add backlight subdev\n"); goto out_dev; @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, if (pdata && pdata->power) { ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &power_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(power_devs), - &power_supply_resources[0], 0); + &power_supply_resources[0], 0, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add power supply " "subdev\n"); @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ int __devinit max8925_device_init(struct max8925_chip *chip, if (pdata && pdata->touch) { ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &touch_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(touch_devs), - &touch_resources[0], 0); + &touch_resources[0], 0, NULL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add touch subdev\n"); goto out_dev; |