diff options
author | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2012-05-18 13:13:33 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2012-05-18 13:13:33 -0300 |
commit | 16ee6576e25b83806d26eb771138249fcfb5eddc (patch) | |
tree | 7c717b80f28b5c59ba673dc00f2ca9bd0fc068d4 /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | |
parent | 16fa7e8200fb9066b77a3f27cbed8e4a9fc71998 (diff) | |
parent | 9b63776fa3ca96c4ecda76f6fa947b7b0add66ac (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-16ee6576e25b83806d26eb771138249fcfb5eddc.tar.gz talos-op-linux-16ee6576e25b83806d26eb771138249fcfb5eddc.zip |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'tip/perf/urgent' into perf/core
Merge reason: We are going to queue up a dependent patch:
"perf tools: Move parse event automated tests to separated object"
That depends on:
commit e7c72d8
perf tools: Add 'G' and 'H' modifiers to event parsing
Conflicts:
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
Conflicted with the recent 'perf_target' patches when checking the
result of perf_evsel open routines to see if a retry is needed to cope
with older kernels where the exclude guest/host perf_event_attr bits
were not used.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 0a44b90602b0..1c67ca100e4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ * contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap. * * See http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html - * http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html + * and section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6" + * (Publication # 21266 Issue Date: August 1998) * * The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up * the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some @@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n"); else printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n"); - printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n"); } /* K6 with old style WHCR */ @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu); /* - * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform, - * so invoke platform-specific handler + * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a + * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some + * IDs of the CPU. */ - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) + if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id) x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node); if (!node_online(node)) { |