talos-op-linux/net/rxrpc, branch master

rxrpc: Fix call RCU cleanup using non-bh-safe locks

2020-02-07T10:20:57+00:00

rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call(), which is called as an RCU callback to clean up a put call, calls rxrpc_put_connection() which, deep in its bowels, takes a number of spinlocks in a non-BH-safe way, including rxrpc_conn_id_lock and local->client_conns_lock. RCU callbacks, however, are normally called from softirq context, which can cause lockdep to notice the locking inconsistency. To get lockdep to detect this, it's necessary to have the connection cleaned up on the put at the end of the last of its calls, though normally the clean up is deferred. This can be induced, however, by starting a call on an AF_RXRPC socket and then closing the socket without reading the reply. Fix this by having rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call() punt the destruction to a workqueue if in softirq-mode and defer the destruction to process context. Note that another way to fix this could be to add a bunch of bh-disable annotations to the spinlocks concerned - and there might be more than just those two - but that means spending more time with BHs disabled. Note also that some of these places were covered by bh-disable spinlocks belonging to the rxrpc_transport object, but these got removed without the _bh annotation being retained on the next lock in. Fixes: 999b69f89241 ("rxrpc: Kill the client connection bundle concept") Reported-by: syzbot+d82f3ac8d87e7ccbb2c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+3f1fd6b8cbf8702d134e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Hillf Danton Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix service call disconnection

2020-02-07T10:19:38+00:00

The recent patch that substituted a flag on an rxrpc_call for the connection pointer being NULL as an indication that a call was disconnected puts the set_bit in the wrong place for service calls. This is only a problem if a call is implicitly terminated by a new call coming in on the same connection channel instead of a terminating ACK packet. In such a case, rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call() calls __rxrpc_disconnect_call(), which is now (incorrectly) setting the disconnection bit, meaning that when rxrpc_release_call() is later called, it doesn't call rxrpc_disconnect_call() and so the call isn't removed from the peer's error distribution list and the list gets corrupted. KASAN finds the issue as an access after release on a call, but the position at which it occurs is confusing as it appears to be related to a different call (the call site is where the latter call is being removed from the error distribution list and either the next or pprev pointer points to a previously released call). Fix this by moving the setting of the flag from __rxrpc_disconnect_call() to rxrpc_disconnect_call() in the same place that the connection pointer was being cleared. Fixes: 5273a191dca6 ("rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect

2020-02-03T10:25:30+00:00

When a call is disconnected, the connection pointer from the call is cleared to make sure it isn't used again and to prevent further attempted transmission for the call. Unfortunately, there might be a daemon trying to use it at the same time to transmit a packet. Fix this by keeping call->conn set, but setting a flag on the call to indicate disconnection instead. Remove also the bits in the transmission functions where the conn pointer is checked and a ref taken under spinlock as this is now redundant. Fixes: 8d94aa381dab ("rxrpc: Calls shouldn't hold socket refs") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object

2020-01-30T21:50:41+00:00

The introduction of a split between the reference count on rxrpc_local objects and the usage count didn't quite go far enough. A number of kernel work items need to make use of the socket to perform transmission. These also need to get an active count on the local object to prevent the socket from being closed. Fix this by getting the active count in those places. Also split out the raw active count get/put functions as these places tend to hold refs on the rxrpc_local object already, so getting and putting an extra object ref is just a waste of time. The problem can lead to symptoms like: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 .. CPU: 2 PID: 818 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 5.5.0-fscache+ #51 ... RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sendmsg+0x5/0x13 ... Call Trace: security_socket_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3e sock_sendmsg+0x1a/0x46 rxrpc_send_keepalive+0x131/0x1ae rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x219/0x34b process_one_work+0x18e/0x271 worker_thread+0x1a3/0x247 kthread+0xe6/0xeb ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Fixes: 730c5fd42c1e ("rxrpc: Fix local endpoint refcounting") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation

2020-01-30T21:50:41+00:00

In rxrpc_input_data(), rxrpc_notify_socket() is called if the base sequence number of the packet is immediately following the hard-ack point at the end of the function. However, this isn't sufficient, since the recvmsg side may have been advancing the window and then overrun the position in which we're adding - at which point rx_hard_ack >= seq0 and no notification is generated. Fix this by always generating a notification at the end of the input function. Without this, a long call may stall, possibly indefinitely. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_put_local()

2020-01-30T21:50:41+00:00

Fix rxrpc_put_local() to not access local->debug_id after calling atomic_dec_return() as, unless that returned n==0, we no longer have the right to access the object. Fixes: 06d9532fa6b3 ("rxrpc: Fix read-after-free in rxrpc_queue_local()") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_receive_data()

2020-01-27T09:56:30+00:00

The subpacket scanning loop in rxrpc_receive_data() references the subpacket count in the private data part of the sk_buff in the loop termination condition. However, when the final subpacket is pasted into the ring buffer, the function is no longer has a ref on the sk_buff and should not be looking at sp->* any more. This point is actually marked in the code when skb is cleared (but sp is not - which is an error). Fix this by caching sp->nr_subpackets in a local variable and using that instead. Also clear 'sp' to catch accesses after that point. This can show up as an oops in rxrpc_get_skb() if sp->nr_subpackets gets trashed by the sk_buff getting freed and reused in the meantime. Fixes: e2de6c404898 ("rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packet") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

Merge tag 'rxrpc-fixes-20191220' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs

2019-12-25T00:12:47+00:00

David Howells says: ==================== rxrpc: Fixes Here are a couple of bugfixes plus a patch that makes one of the bugfixes easier: (1) Move the ping and mutex unlock on a new call from rxrpc_input_packet() into rxrpc_new_incoming_call(), which it calls. This means the lock-unlock section is entirely within the latter function. This simplifies patch (2). (2) Don't take the call->user_mutex at all in the softirq path. Mutexes aren't allowed to be taken or released there and a patch was merged that caused a warning to be emitted every time this happened. Looking at the code again, it looks like that taking the mutex isn't actually necessary, as the value of call->state will block access to the call. (3) Fix the incoming call path to check incoming calls earlier to reject calls to RPC services for which we don't have a security key of the appropriate class. This avoids an assertion failure if YFS tries making a secure call to the kafs cache manager RPC service. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix missing security check on incoming calls

2019-12-20T16:21:32+00:00

Fix rxrpc_new_incoming_call() to check that we have a suitable service key available for the combination of service ID and security class of a new incoming call - and to reject calls for which we don't. This causes an assertion like the following to appear: rxrpc: Assertion failed - 6(0x6) == 12(0xc) is false kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/call_object.c:456! Where call->state is RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING (6) rather than RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE (12). Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Reported-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Don't take call->user_mutex in rxrpc_new_incoming_call()

2019-12-20T16:20:56+00:00

Standard kernel mutexes cannot be used in any way from interrupt or softirq context, so the user_mutex which manages access to a call cannot be a mutex since on a new call the mutex must start off locked and be unlocked within the softirq handler to prevent userspace interfering with a call we're setting up. Commit a0855d24fc22d49cdc25664fb224caee16998683 ("locking/mutex: Complain upon mutex API misuse in IRQ contexts") causes big warnings to be splashed in dmesg for each a new call that comes in from the server. Whilst it *seems* like it should be okay, since the accept path uses trylock, there are issues with PI boosting and marking the wrong task as the owner. Fix this by not taking the mutex in the softirq path at all. It's not obvious that there should be any need for it as the state is set before the first notification is generated for the new call. There's also no particular reason why the link-assessing ping should be triggered inside the mutex. It's not actually transmitted there anyway, but rather it has to be deferred to a workqueue. Further, I don't think that there's any particular reason that the socket notification needs to be done from within rx->incoming_lock, so the amount of time that lock is held can be shortened too and the ping prepared before the new call notification is sent. Fixes: 540b1c48c37a ("rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) cc: Ingo Molnar cc: Will Deacon cc: Davidlohr Bueso