talos-op-linux/kernel/ptrace.c, branch v4.4.17

ptrace: use fsuid, fsgid, effective creds for fs access checks

2016-02-25T20:01:16+00:00

commit caaee6234d05a58c5b4d05e7bf766131b810a657 upstream. By checking the effective credentials instead of the real UID / permitted capabilities, ensure that the calling process actually intended to use its credentials. To ensure that all ptrace checks use the correct caller credentials (e.g. in case out-of-tree code or newly added code omits the PTRACE_MODE_*CREDS flag), use two new flags and require one of them to be set. The problem was that when a privileged task had temporarily dropped its privileges, e.g. by calling setreuid(0, user_uid), with the intent to perform following syscalls with the credentials of a user, it still passed ptrace access checks that the user would not be able to pass. While an attacker should not be able to convince the privileged task to perform a ptrace() syscall, this is a problem because the ptrace access check is reused for things in procfs. In particular, the following somewhat interesting procfs entries only rely on ptrace access checks: /proc/$pid/stat - uses the check for determining whether pointers should be visible, useful for bypassing ASLR /proc/$pid/maps - also useful for bypassing ASLR /proc/$pid/cwd - useful for gaining access to restricted directories that contain files with lax permissions, e.g. in this scenario: lrwxrwxrwx root root /proc/13020/cwd -> /root/foobar drwx------ root root /root drwxr-xr-x root root /root/foobar -rw-r--r-- root root /root/foobar/secret Therefore, on a system where a root-owned mode 6755 binary changes its effective credentials as described and then dumps a user-specified file, this could be used by an attacker to reveal the memory layout of root's processes or reveal the contents of files he is not allowed to access (through /proc/$pid/cwd). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Acked-by: Kees Cook Cc: Casey Schaufler Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: James Morris Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Al Viro Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

seccomp, ptrace: add support for dumping seccomp filters

2015-10-28T02:55:13+00:00

This patch adds support for dumping a process' (classic BPF) seccomp filters via ptrace. PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER allows the tracer to dump the user's classic BPF seccomp filters. addr should be an integer which represents the ith seccomp filter (0 is the most recently installed filter). data should be a struct sock_filter * with enough room for the ith filter, or NULL, in which case the filter is not saved. The return value for this command is the number of BPF instructions the program represents, or negative in the case of errors. Command specific errors are ENOENT: which indicates that there is no ith filter in this seccomp tree, and EMEDIUMTYPE, which indicates that the ith filter was not installed as a classic BPF filter. A caveat with this approach is that there is no way to get explicitly at the heirarchy of seccomp filters, and users need to memcmp() filters to decide which are inherited. This means that a task which installs two of the same filter can potentially confuse users of this interface. v2: * make save_orig const * check that the orig_prog exists (not necessary right now, but when grows eBPF support it will be) * s/n/filter_off and make it an unsigned long to match ptrace * count "down" the tree instead of "up" when passing a filter offset v3: * don't take the current task's lock for inspecting its seccomp mode * use a 0x42** constant for the ptrace command value v4: * don't copy to userspace while holding spinlocks v5: * add another condition to WARN_ON v6: * rebase on net-next Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen Acked-by: Kees Cook CC: Will Drewry Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov CC: Andy Lutomirski CC: Pavel Emelyanov CC: Serge E. Hallyn CC: Alexei Starovoitov CC: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

seccomp: add ptrace options for suspend/resume

2015-07-15T18:52:52+00:00

This patch is the first step in enabling checkpoint/restore of processes with seccomp enabled. One of the things CRIU does while dumping tasks is inject code into them via ptrace to collect information that is only available to the process itself. However, if we are in a seccomp mode where these processes are prohibited from making these syscalls, then what CRIU does kills the task. This patch adds a new ptrace option, PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP, that enables a task from the init user namespace which has CAP_SYS_ADMIN and no seccomp filters to disable (and re-enable) seccomp filters for another task so that they can be successfully dumped (and restored). We restrict the set of processes that can disable seccomp through ptrace because although today ptrace can be used to bypass seccomp, there is some discussion of closing this loophole in the future and we would like this patch to not depend on that behavior and be future proofed for when it is removed. Note that seccomp can be suspended before any filters are actually installed; this behavior is useful on criu restore, so that we can suspend seccomp, restore the filters, unmap our restore code from the restored process' address space, and then resume the task by detaching and have the filters resumed as well. v2 changes: * require that the tracer have no seccomp filters installed * drop TIF_NOTSC manipulation from the patch * change from ptrace command to a ptrace option and use this ptrace option as the flag to check. This means that as soon as the tracer detaches/dies, seccomp is re-enabled and as a corrollary that one can not disable seccomp across PTRACE_ATTACHs. v3 changes: * get rid of various #ifdefs everywhere * report more sensible errors when PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP is incorrectly used v4 changes: * get rid of may_suspend_seccomp() in favor of a capable() check in ptrace directly v5 changes: * check that seccomp is not enabled (or suspended) on the tracer Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen CC: Will Drewry CC: Roland McGrath CC: Pavel Emelyanov CC: Serge E. Hallyn Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski [kees: access seccomp.mode through seccomp_mode() instead] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

ptrace: ptrace_detach() can no longer race with SIGKILL

2015-04-17T13:04:06+00:00

ptrace_detach() re-checks ->ptrace under tasklist lock and calls release_task() if __ptrace_detach() returns true. This was needed because the __TASK_TRACED tracee could be killed/untraced, and it could even pass exit_notify() before we take tasklist_lock. But this is no longer possible after 9899d11f6544 "ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL". We can turn these checks into WARN_ON() and remove release_task(). While at it, document the setting of child->exit_code. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Pavel Labath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ptrace: fix race between ptrace_resume() and wait_task_stopped()

2015-04-17T13:04:06+00:00

ptrace_resume() is called when the tracee is still __TASK_TRACED. We set tracee->exit_code and then wake_up_state() changes tracee->state. If the tracer's sub-thread does wait() in between, task_stopped_code(ptrace => T) wrongly looks like another report from tracee. This confuses debugger, and since wait_task_stopped() clears ->exit_code the tracee can miss a signal. Test-case: #include #include #include #include #include #include int pid; void *waiter(void *arg) { int stat; for (;;) { assert(pid == wait(&stat)); assert(WIFSTOPPED(stat)); if (WSTOPSIG(stat) == SIGHUP) continue; assert(WSTOPSIG(stat) == SIGCONT); printf("ERR! extra/wrong report:%x\n", stat); } } int main(void) { pthread_t thread; pid = fork(); if (!pid) { assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0,0) == 0); for (;;) kill(getpid(), SIGHUP); } assert(pthread_create(&thread, NULL, waiter, NULL) == 0); for (;;) ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0, SIGCONT); return 0; } Note for stable: the bug is very old, but without 9899d11f6544 "ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL" the fix should use lock_task_sighand(child). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Reported-by: Pavel Labath Tested-by: Pavel Labath Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ptrace: remove linux/compat.h inclusion under CONFIG_COMPAT

2015-02-17T22:34:51+00:00

Commit 84c751bd4aeb ("ptrace: add ability to retrieve signals without removing from a queue (v4)") includes globally in ptrace.c This patch removes inclusion under if defined CONFIG_COMPAT. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

exit: ptrace: shift "reap dead" code from exit_ptrace() to forget_original_parent()

2014-12-11T01:41:10+00:00

Now that forget_original_parent() uses ->ptrace_entry for EXIT_DEAD tasks, we can simply pass "dead_children" list to exit_ptrace() and remove another release_task() loop. Plus this way we do not need to drop and reacquire tasklist_lock. Also shift the list_empty(ptraced) check, if we want this optimization it makes sense to eliminate the function call altogether. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Aaron Tomlin Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Cc: Sterling Alexander Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action functions

2014-07-16T13:10:39+00:00

The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action' function to be provided which does the actual waiting. There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical. Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule(). So: Rename wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock to wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action to make it explicit that they need an action function. Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use a standard one. The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action function. All instances of the old wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock which can use the new version have been changed accordingly and their action functions have been discarded. wait_on_bit{_lock} does not return any specific error code in the event of a signal so the caller must check for non-zero and interpolate their own error code as appropriate. The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. David Howells confirms this should be uniformly "uninterruptible" The main remaining user of wait_on_bit{,_lock}_action is NFS which needs to use a freezer-aware schedule() call. A comment in fs/gfs2/glock.c notes that having multiple 'action' functions is useful as they display differently in the 'wchan' field of 'ps'. (and /proc/$PID/wchan). As the new bit_wait{,_io} functions are tagged "__sched", they will not show up at all, but something higher in the stack. So the distinction will still be visible, only with different function names (gds2_glock_wait versus gfs2_glock_dq_wait in the gfs2/glock.c case). Since first version of this patch (against 3.15) two new action functions appeared, on in NFS and one in CIFS. CIFS also now uses an action function that makes the same freezer aware schedule call as NFS. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Acked-by: David Howells (fscache, keys) Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse (gfs2) Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Steve French Cc: Linus Torvalds Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051603.28027.72349.stgit@notabene.brown Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

kernel/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE

2014-03-06T14:35:10+00:00

Convert all compat system call functions where all parameter types have a size of four or less than four bytes, or are pointer types to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE. The implicit casts within COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE will perform proper zero and sign extension to 64 bit of all parameters if needed. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens

exec/ptrace: fix get_dumpable() incorrect tests

2013-11-13T03:09:33+00:00

The get_dumpable() return value is not boolean. Most users of the function actually want to be testing for non-SUID_DUMP_USER(1) rather than SUID_DUMP_DISABLE(0). The SUID_DUMP_ROOT(2) is also considered a protected state. Almost all places did this correctly, excepting the two places fixed in this patch. Wrong logic: if (dumpable == SUID_DUMP_DISABLE) { /* be protective */ } or if (dumpable == 0) { /* be protective */ } or if (!dumpable) { /* be protective */ } Correct logic: if (dumpable != SUID_DUMP_USER) { /* be protective */ } or if (dumpable != 1) { /* be protective */ } Without this patch, if the system had set the sysctl fs/suid_dumpable=2, a user was able to ptrace attach to processes that had dropped privileges to that user. (This may have been partially mitigated if Yama was enabled.) The macros have been moved into the file that declares get/set_dumpable(), which means things like the ia64 code can see them too. CVE-2013-2929 Reported-by: Vasily Kulikov Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds