talos-op-linux/drivers/input/keyboard, branch master

Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input

2020-02-16T00:49:25+00:00

Pull input updates from Dmitry Torokhov: - a few drivers have been updated to use flexible-array syntax instead of GCC extension - ili210x touchscreen driver now supports the 2120 protocol flavor - a couple more of Synaptics devices have been switched over to RMI4 * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input: Input: cyapa - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Input: tca6416-keypad - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Input: gpio_keys_polled - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Input: synaptics - remove the LEN0049 dmi id from topbuttonpad list Input: synaptics - enable SMBus on ThinkPad L470 Input: synaptics - switch T470s to RMI4 by default Input: gpio_keys - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Input: goldfish_events - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Input: psmouse - switch to using i2c_new_scanned_device() Input: ili210x - add ili2120 support Input: ili210x - fix return value of is_visible function

Input: tca6416-keypad - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-02-15T01:19:21+00:00

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214172022.GA27490@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov

Input: gpio_keys_polled - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-02-15T01:19:19+00:00

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171907.GA26588@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov

Input: gpio_keys - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-02-14T01:09:47+00:00

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213002600.GA31916@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov

Input: goldfish_events - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-02-14T01:09:47+00:00

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213002430.GA31056@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

2020-02-01T01:42:33+00:00

Prepare input updates for 5.6 merge window.

Merge tag 'ioremap-5.6' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/ioremap

2020-01-27T21:03:00+00:00

Pull ioremap updates from Christoph Hellwig: "Remove the ioremap_nocache API (plus wrappers) that are always identical to ioremap" * tag 'ioremap-5.6' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/ioremap: remove ioremap_nocache and devm_ioremap_nocache MIPS: define ioremap_nocache to ioremap

Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input

2020-01-09T23:37:40+00:00

Pull input fixes from Dmitry Torokhov: "Just a few small fixups here" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input: Input: imx_sc_key - only take the valid data from SCU firmware as key state Input: add safety guards to input_set_keycode() Input: input_event - fix struct padding on sparc64 Input: uinput - always report EPOLLOUT

remove ioremap_nocache and devm_ioremap_nocache

2020-01-06T08:45:59+00:00

ioremap has provided non-cached semantics by default since the Linux 2.6 days, so remove the additional ioremap_nocache interface. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann

Input: imx_sc_key - only take the valid data from SCU firmware as key state

2019-12-14T00:41:57+00:00

When reading key state from SCU, the response data from SCU firmware is 4 bytes due to MU message protocol, but ONLY the first byte is the key state, other 3 bytes could be some dirty data, so we should ONLY take the first byte as key state to avoid reporting incorrect state. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang Fixes: 688f1dfb69b4 ("Input: keyboard - imx_sc: Add i.MX system controller key support") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1576202909-1661-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov