summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/ext4/ext4_write.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* ext4: avoid calling ext4fs_mount() twice, which leaksStephen Warren2015-09-111-9/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | ext4_write_file() is only called from the "fs" layer, which calls both ext4fs_mount() and ext4fs_close() before/after calling ext4_write_file(). Fix ext4_write_file() not to call ext4fs_mount() again, since the mount operation malloc()s some RAM which is leaked when a second mount call over-writes the pointer to that data, if no intervening close call is made. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
* Move ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER() to the new memalign.h headerSimon Glass2015-09-111-0/+1
| | | | | | | Now that we have a new header file for cache-aligned allocation, we should move the stack-based allocation macro there also. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* fs: ext4 write: return file len on successPrzemyslaw Marczak2015-03-051-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | After rework of the file system API, the size of ext4 write was missed. This causes printing unreliable write size at the end of the file system write operation. Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com> Cc: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
* ext4: Prepare API change for files greater than 2GBSuriyan Ramasami2014-11-231-0/+32
| | | | | | | | | Change the internal EXT4 functions to use loff_t for offsets. Signed-off-by: Suriyan Ramasami <suriyan.r@gmail.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [trini: Update common/spl/spl_ext.c] Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
* ext4: correctly zero filenameJeroen Hofstee2014-06-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Since ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER declares a char* for filename sizeof(filename) is not the size of the buffer. Use the already known length instead. cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@samsung.com> cc: Manjunatha C Achar <a.manjunatha@samsung.com> cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
* fs:ext4:write:fix: Reinitialize global variables after updating a fileŁukasz Majewski2014-05-121-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This bug shows up when file stored on the ext4 file system is updated. The ext4fs_delete_file() is responsible for deleting file's (e.g. uImage) data. However some global data (especially ext4fs_indir2_block), which is used during file deletion are left unchanged. The ext4fs_indir2_block pointer stores reference to old ext4 double indirect allocated blocks. When it is unchanged, after file deletion, ext4fs_write_file() uses the same pointer (since it is already initialized - i.e. not NULL) to return number of blocks to write. This trunks larger file when previous one was smaller. Lets consider following scenario: 1. Flash target with ext4 formatted boot.img (which has uImage [*] on itself) 2. Developer wants to upload their custom uImage [**] - When new uImage [**] is smaller than the [*] - everything works correctly - we are able to store the whole smaller file with corrupted ext4fs_indir2_block pointer - When new uImage [**] is larger than the [*] - theCRC is corrupted, since truncation on data stored at eMMC was done. 3. When uImage CRC error appears, then reboot and LTHOR/DFU reflashing causes proper setting of ext4fs_indir2_block() and after that uImage[**] is successfully stored (correct uImage [*] metadata is stored at an eMMC on the first flashing). Due to above the bug was very difficult to reproduce. This patch sets default values for all ext4fs_indir* pointers/variables. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
* fs:ext4:cleanup: Remove superfluous codeŁukasz Majewski2014-05-121-37/+19
| | | | | | | | | Code responsible for handling situation when ext4 has block size of 1024B can be ordered to take less space. This patch does that for ext4 common and write files. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
* fs/ext4: fix calling put_ext4 with truncated offsetMa Haijun2014-01-201-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | Curently, we are using 32 bit multiplication to calculate the offset, so the result will always be 32 bit. This can silently cause file system corruption when performing a write operation on partition larger than 4 GiB. This patch address the issue by simply promoting the terms to 64 bit, and let compilers decide how to do the multiplication efficiently. Signed-off-by: Ma Haijun <mahaijuns@gmail.com>
* Add GPL-2.0+ SPDX-License-Identifier to source filesWolfgang Denk2013-07-241-13/+1
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> [trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c] Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
* Fix ext2/ext4 filesystem accesses beyond 2TiBFrederic Leroy2013-07-151-21/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA, lbaint_t gets defined as a 64-bit type, which is required to represent block numbers for storage devices that exceed 2TiB (the block size usually is 512B), e.g. recent hard drives We now use lbaint_t for partition offset to reflect the lbaint_t change, and access partitions beyond or crossing the 2.1TiB limit. This required changes to signature of ext4fs_devread(), and type of all variables relatives to block sector. ext2/ext4 fs uses logical block represented by a 32 bit value. Logical block is a multiple of device block sector. To avoid overflow problem when calling ext4fs_devread(), we need to cast the sector parameter. Signed-off-by: Frédéric Leroy <fredo@starox.org>
* fs/ext4: Support device block sizes != 512 bytesEgbert Eich2013-05-101-15/+17
| | | | | | | | | The 512 byte block size was hard coded in the ext4 file systems. Large harddisks today support bigger block sizes typically 4096 bytes. This patch removes this limitation. Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>
* ext4: Split write support into its own fileSimon Glass2013-03-041-0/+996
This code seems to be entirely othogonal, so remove the #ifdef and put the condition in the Makefile instead. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud