summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>2015-09-17 15:42:39 -0500
committerTom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>2015-10-22 14:18:38 -0400
commitddf56bc7e3ef43920b4a23320e70c1998f1ef843 (patch)
tree1ff8b54e491fb4c2c3e3f2c293694e32bea57b2a /doc
parent0da3f2e69557a4d14e7cdd3677ee012ff1292059 (diff)
downloadtalos-obmc-uboot-ddf56bc7e3ef43920b4a23320e70c1998f1ef843.tar.gz
talos-obmc-uboot-ddf56bc7e3ef43920b4a23320e70c1998f1ef843.zip
drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework
Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors. Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a offload of specific function such as event integration or power management or controlling camera etc. Traditionally, the responsibility of loading up such a processor with a firmware and communication has been with a High Level Operating System(HLOS) such as Linux. However, there exists classes of products where Linux would need to expect services from such a processor or the delay of Linux and operating system being able to load up such a firmware is unacceptable. To address these needs, we need some minimal capability to load such a system and ensure it is started prior to an Operating System(Linux or any other) is started up. NOTE: This is NOT meant to be a solve-all solution, instead, it tries to address certain class of SoCs and products that need such a solution. A very simple model is introduced here as part of the initial support that supports microcontrollers with internal memory (no MMU, no execution from external memory, or specific image format needs). This basic framework can then (hopefully) be extensible to other complex SoC processor support as need be. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/device-tree-bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc.txt14
-rw-r--r--doc/driver-model/remoteproc-framework.txt168
2 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/device-tree-bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc.txt b/doc/device-tree-bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..031764f515
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/device-tree-bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Remote Processor uclass
+
+Binding:
+
+Remoteproc devices shall have compatible corresponding to thier
+drivers. However the following generic properties will be supported
+
+Optional Properties:
+- remoteproc-name: a string, used if provided to describe the processor.
+ This must be unique in an operational system.
+- remoteproc-internal-memory-mapped: a bool, indicates that the remote
+ processor has internal memory that it uses to execute code and store
+ data. Such a device is not expected to have a MMU. If no type property
+ is provided, the device is assumed to map to such a model.
diff --git a/doc/driver-model/remoteproc-framework.txt b/doc/driver-model/remoteproc-framework.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..094e98bba6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/driver-model/remoteproc-framework.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+#
+# (C) Copyright 2015
+# Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+#
+
+Remote Processor Framework
+==========================
+TOC:
+1. Introduction
+2. How does it work - The driver
+3. Describing the device using platform data
+4. Describing the device using device tree
+
+1. Introduction
+===============
+
+This is an introduction to driver-model for Remote Processors found
+on various System on Chip(SoCs). The term remote processor is used to
+indicate that this is not the processor on which U-Boot is operating
+on, instead is yet another processing entity that may be controlled by
+the processor on which we are functional.
+
+The simplified model depends on a single UCLASS - UCLASS_REMOTEPROC
+
+UCLASS_REMOTEPROC:
+- drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c
+- include/remoteproc.h
+
+Commands:
+- common/cmd_remoteproc.c
+
+Configuration:
+CONFIG_REMOTEPROC is selected by drivers as needed
+CONFIG_CMD_REMOTEPROC for the commands if required.
+
+2. How does it work - The driver
+=================================
+
+Overall, the driver statemachine transitions are typically as follows:
+ (entry)
+ +-------+
+ +---+ init |
+ | | | <---------------------+
+ | +-------+ |
+ | |
+ | |
+ | +--------+ |
+Load| | reset | |
+ | | | <----------+ |
+ | +--------+ | |
+ | |Load | |
+ | | | |
+ | +----v----+ reset | |
+ +-> | | (opt) | |
+ | Loaded +-----------+ |
+ | | |
+ +----+----+ |
+ | Start |
+ +---v-----+ (opt) |
+ +->| Running | Stop |
+Ping +- | +--------------------+
+(opt) +---------+
+
+(is_running does not change state)
+opt: Optional state transition implemented by driver.
+
+NOTE: It depends on the remote processor as to the exact behavior
+of the statemachine, remoteproc core does not intent to implement
+statemachine logic. Certain processors may allow start/stop without
+reloading the image in the middle, certain other processors may only
+allow us to start the processor(image from a EEPROM/OTP) etc.
+
+It is hence the responsibility of the driver to handle the requisite
+state transitions of the device as necessary.
+
+Basic design assumptions:
+
+Remote processor can operate on a certain firmware that maybe loaded
+and released from reset.
+
+The driver follows a standard UCLASS DM.
+
+in the bare minimum form:
+
+static const struct dm_rproc_ops sandbox_testproc_ops = {
+ .load = sandbox_testproc_load,
+ .start = sandbox_testproc_start,
+};
+
+static const struct udevice_id sandbox_ids[] = {
+ {.compatible = "sandbox,test-processor"},
+ {}
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(sandbox_testproc) = {
+ .name = "sandbox_test_proc",
+ .of_match = sandbox_ids,
+ .id = UCLASS_REMOTEPROC,
+ .ops = &sandbox_testproc_ops,
+ .probe = sandbox_testproc_probe,
+};
+
+This allows for the device to be probed as part of the "init" command
+or invocation of 'rproc_init()' function as the system dependencies define.
+
+The driver is expected to maintain it's own statemachine which is
+appropriate for the device it maintains. It must, at the very least
+provide a load and start function. We assume here that the device
+needs to be loaded and started, else, there is no real purpose of
+using the remoteproc framework.
+
+3. Describing the device using platform data
+============================================
+
+*IMPORTANT* NOTE: THIS SUPPORT IS NOT MEANT FOR USE WITH NEWER PLATFORM
+SUPPORT. THIS IS ONLY FOR LEGACY DEVICES. THIS MODE OF INITIALIZATION
+*WILL* BE EVENTUALLY REMOVED ONCE ALL NECESSARY PLATFORMS HAVE MOVED
+TO DM/FDT.
+
+Considering that many platforms are yet to move to device-tree model,
+a simplified definition of a device is as follows:
+
+struct dm_rproc_uclass_pdata proc_3_test = {
+ .name = "proc_3_legacy",
+ .mem_type = RPROC_INTERNAL_MEMORY_MAPPED,
+ .driver_plat_data = &mydriver_data;
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DEVICE(proc_3_demo) = {
+ .name = "sandbox_test_proc",
+ .platdata = &proc_3_test,
+};
+
+There can be additional data that may be desired depending on the
+remoteproc driver specific needs (for example: SoC integration
+details such as clock handle or something similar). See appropriate
+documentation for specific remoteproc driver for further details.
+These are passed via driver_plat_data.
+
+3. Describing the device using device tree
+==========================================
+/ {
+ ...
+ aliases {
+ ...
+ remoteproc0 = &rproc_1;
+ remoteproc1 = &rproc_2;
+
+ };
+ ...
+
+ rproc_1: rproc@1 {
+ compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
+ remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev1";
+ };
+
+ rproc_2: rproc@2 {
+ compatible = "sandbox,test-processor";
+ internal-memory-mapped;
+ remoteproc-name = "remoteproc-test-dev2";
+ };
+ ...
+};
+
+aliases usage is optional, but it is usually recommended to ensure the
+users have a consistent usage model for a platform.
+the compatible string used here is specific to the remoteproc driver involved.
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud