From 81f5c6f5db37bf2360b64c304b27b8f499b48367 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:38:16 -0800 Subject: bpf: btf: allow typedef func_proto Current implementation does not allow typedef func_proto. But it is actually allowed. -bash-4.4$ cat t.c typedef int (f) (int); f *g; -bash-4.4$ clang -O2 -g -c -target bpf t.c -Xclang -target-feature -Xclang +dwarfris -bash-4.4$ pahole -JV t.o File t.o: [1] PTR (anon) type_id=2 [2] TYPEDEF f type_id=3 [3] FUNC_PROTO (anon) return=4 args=(4 (anon)) [4] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED -bash-4.4$ This patch related btf verifier to allow such (typedef func_proto) patterns. Fixes: 2667a2626f4d ("bpf: btf: Add BTF_KIND_FUNC and BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index befe570be5ba..c57bd10340ed 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -1459,7 +1459,8 @@ static int btf_modifier_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env, /* "typedef void new_void", "const void"...etc */ if (!btf_type_is_void(next_type) && - !btf_type_is_fwd(next_type)) { + !btf_type_is_fwd(next_type) && + !btf_type_is_func_proto(next_type)) { btf_verifier_log_type(env, v->t, "Invalid type_id"); return -EINVAL; } -- cgit v1.2.1 From 6cab5e90ab2bd323c9f3811b6c70a4687df51e27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:43:34 -0800 Subject: bpf: run bpf programs with preemption disabled Disabled preemption is necessary for proper access to per-cpu maps from BPF programs. But the sender side of socket filters didn't have preemption disabled: unix_dgram_sendmsg->sk_filter->sk_filter_trim_cap->bpf_prog_run_save_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN and a combination of af_packet with tun device didn't disable either: tpacket_snd->packet_direct_xmit->packet_pick_tx_queue->ndo_select_queue-> tun_select_queue->tun_ebpf_select_queue->bpf_prog_run_clear_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN Disable preemption before executing BPF programs (both classic and extended). Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann --- kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c index ab612fe9862f..d17d05570a3f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(struct sock *sk, bpf_compute_and_save_data_end(skb, &saved_data_end); ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], skb, - bpf_prog_run_save_cb); + __bpf_prog_run_save_cb); bpf_restore_data_end(skb, saved_data_end); __skb_pull(skb, offset); skb->sk = save_sk; -- cgit v1.2.1 From a89fac57b5d080771efd4d71feaae19877cf68f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:12:43 -0800 Subject: bpf: fix lockdep false positive in percpu_freelist Lockdep warns about false positive: [ 12.492084] 00000000e6b28347 (&head->lock){+...}, at: pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.492696] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past: [ 12.493275] (&rq->lock){-.-.} [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 12.493276] [ 12.494435] [ 12.494435] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.494979] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 12.494979] [ 12.495518] CPU0 CPU1 [ 12.495879] ---- ---- [ 12.496243] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.496502] local_irq_disable(); [ 12.496969] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.497431] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.497890] [ 12.498104] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.498368] [ 12.498368] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 12.498368] [ 12.498837] 1 lock held by dd/276: [ 12.499110] #0: 00000000c58cb2ee (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: trace_call_bpf+0x5e/0x240 [ 12.499747] [ 12.499747] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: [ 12.500389] -> (&rq->lock){-.-.} { [ 12.500669] IN-HARDIRQ-W at: [ 12.500934] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.501373] scheduler_tick+0x4c/0xf0 [ 12.501812] update_process_times+0x40/0x50 [ 12.502294] tick_periodic+0x27/0xb0 [ 12.502723] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x60 [ 12.503203] timer_interrupt+0x11/0x20 [ 12.503651] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 [ 12.504167] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50 [ 12.504674] handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60 [ 12.505139] handle_level_irq+0xa7/0x120 [ 12.505601] handle_irq+0xa1/0x150 [ 12.506018] do_IRQ+0x77/0x140 [ 12.506411] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d [ 12.506834] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x53/0x60 [ 12.507362] __setup_irq+0x481/0x730 [ 12.507789] setup_irq+0x49/0x80 [ 12.508195] hpet_time_init+0x21/0x32 [ 12.508644] x86_late_time_init+0xb/0x16 [ 12.509106] start_kernel+0x390/0x42a [ 12.509554] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.510034] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: [ 12.510305] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.510772] try_to_wake_up+0x1c7/0x4e0 [ 12.511220] swake_up_locked+0x20/0x40 [ 12.511657] swake_up_one+0x1a/0x30 [ 12.512070] rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5/0x650 [ 12.512553] __do_softirq+0xe6/0x47b [ 12.512978] irq_exit+0xc3/0xd0 [ 12.513372] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa9/0x250 [ 12.513876] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 12.514343] default_idle+0x1c/0x170 [ 12.514765] do_idle+0x199/0x240 [ 12.515159] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 12.515614] start_kernel+0x422/0x42a [ 12.516045] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.516521] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.516774] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x50 [ 12.517258] rq_attach_root+0x16/0xd0 [ 12.517685] sched_init+0x2f2/0x3eb [ 12.518096] start_kernel+0x1fb/0x42a [ 12.518525] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.518986] } [ 12.519132] ... key at: [] __key.71384+0x0/0x8 [ 12.519649] ... acquired at: [ 12.519892] pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7b/0xd0 [ 12.520221] bpf_get_stackid+0x1d2/0x4d0 [ 12.520563] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.520887] [ 12.521008] -> (&head->lock){+...} { [ 12.521292] HARDIRQ-ON-W at: [ 12.521539] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.521950] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.522396] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.522828] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.523296] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.523537] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.523944] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xc0/0x120 [ 12.524417] htab_map_alloc+0x405/0x500 [ 12.524835] __do_sys_bpf+0x1a3/0x1a90 [ 12.525253] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 12.525659] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 12.526167] } [ 12.526311] ... key at: [] __key.13130+0x0/0x8 [ 12.526812] ... acquired at: [ 12.527047] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.527371] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.527680] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.527994] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.528325] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.528645] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.528970] [ 12.529092] [ 12.529092] stack backtrace: [ 12.529444] CPU: 0 PID: 276 Comm: dd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422 #475 [ 12.530043] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 12.530750] Call Trace: [ 12.530948] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 12.531248] check_usage_backwards+0x10c/0x120 [ 12.531598] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.531935] ? mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532229] mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532496] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x180/0x180 [ 12.532928] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.533271] ? find_get_entry+0x17f/0x2e0 [ 12.533586] ? find_get_entry+0x19c/0x2e0 [ 12.533902] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534196] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534482] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.534810] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.535099] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535432] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535750] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.536062] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 It has been explained that is a false positive here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/25/756 Recap: - stackmap uses pcpu_freelist - The lock in pcpu_freelist is a percpu lock - stackmap is only used by tracing bpf_prog - A tracing bpf_prog cannot be run if another bpf_prog has already been running (ensured by the percpu bpf_prog_active counter). Eric pointed out that this lockdep splats stops other legit lockdep splats in selftests/bpf/test_progs.c. Fix this by calling local_irq_save/restore for stackmap. Another false positive had also been worked around by calling local_irq_save in commit 89ad2fa3f043 ("bpf: fix lockdep splat"). That commit added unnecessary irq_save/restore to fast path of bpf hash map. irqs are already disabled at that point, since htab is holding per bucket spin_lock with irqsave. Let's reduce overhead for htab by introducing __pcpu_freelist_push/pop function w/o irqsave and convert pcpu_freelist_push/pop to irqsave to be used elsewhere (right now only in stackmap). It stops lockdep false positive in stackmap with a bit of acceptable overhead. Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann --- kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 4 ++-- kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index 4b7c76765d9d..f9274114c88d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l) } if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) { - pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode); + __pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode); } else { atomic_dec(&htab->count); l->htab = htab; @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key, } else { struct pcpu_freelist_node *l; - l = pcpu_freelist_pop(&htab->freelist); + l = __pcpu_freelist_pop(&htab->freelist); if (!l) return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG); l_new = container_of(l, struct htab_elem, fnode); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c index 673fa6fe2d73..0c1b4ba9e90e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ void pcpu_freelist_destroy(struct pcpu_freelist *s) free_percpu(s->freelist); } -static inline void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head, - struct pcpu_freelist_node *node) +static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head, + struct pcpu_freelist_node *node) { raw_spin_lock(&head->lock); node->next = head->first; @@ -37,12 +37,22 @@ static inline void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head, raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock); } -void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *s, +void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *s, struct pcpu_freelist_node *node) { struct pcpu_freelist_head *head = this_cpu_ptr(s->freelist); - __pcpu_freelist_push(head, node); + ___pcpu_freelist_push(head, node); +} + +void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *s, + struct pcpu_freelist_node *node) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + local_irq_save(flags); + __pcpu_freelist_push(s, node); + local_irq_restore(flags); } void pcpu_freelist_populate(struct pcpu_freelist *s, void *buf, u32 elem_size, @@ -63,7 +73,7 @@ void pcpu_freelist_populate(struct pcpu_freelist *s, void *buf, u32 elem_size, for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { again: head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu); - __pcpu_freelist_push(head, buf); + ___pcpu_freelist_push(head, buf); i++; buf += elem_size; if (i == nr_elems) @@ -74,14 +84,12 @@ again: local_irq_restore(flags); } -struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s) +struct pcpu_freelist_node *__pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s) { struct pcpu_freelist_head *head; struct pcpu_freelist_node *node; - unsigned long flags; int orig_cpu, cpu; - local_irq_save(flags); orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); while (1) { head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu); @@ -89,16 +97,25 @@ struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s) node = head->first; if (node) { head->first = node->next; - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&head->lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock); return node; } raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock); cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask); if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) cpu = 0; - if (cpu == orig_cpu) { - local_irq_restore(flags); + if (cpu == orig_cpu) return NULL; - } } } + +struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s) +{ + struct pcpu_freelist_node *ret; + unsigned long flags; + + local_irq_save(flags); + ret = __pcpu_freelist_pop(s); + local_irq_restore(flags); + return ret; +} diff --git a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h index 3049aae8ea1e..c3960118e617 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h +++ b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h @@ -22,8 +22,12 @@ struct pcpu_freelist_node { struct pcpu_freelist_node *next; }; +/* pcpu_freelist_* do spin_lock_irqsave. */ void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *); struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *); +/* __pcpu_freelist_* do spin_lock only. caller must disable irqs. */ +void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *); +struct pcpu_freelist_node *__pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *); void pcpu_freelist_populate(struct pcpu_freelist *s, void *buf, u32 elem_size, u32 nr_elems); int pcpu_freelist_init(struct pcpu_freelist *); -- cgit v1.2.1 From e16ec34039c701594d55d08a5aa49ee3e1abc821 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:12:44 -0800 Subject: bpf: fix potential deadlock in bpf_prog_register Lockdep found a potential deadlock between cpu_hotplug_lock, bpf_event_mutex, and cpuctx_mutex: [ 13.007000] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 13.007587] 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422-dirty #477 Not tainted [ 13.008124] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 13.008624] test_progs/246 is trying to acquire lock: [ 13.009030] 0000000094160d1d (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}, at: tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.009770] [ 13.009770] but task is already holding lock: [ 13.010239] 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.010877] [ 13.010877] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 13.010877] [ 13.011532] [ 13.011532] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 13.012129] [ 13.012129] -> #4 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.012582] perf_event_query_prog_array+0x9b/0x130 [ 13.013016] _perf_ioctl+0x3aa/0x830 [ 13.013354] perf_ioctl+0x2e/0x50 [ 13.013668] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x6a0 [ 13.014003] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 13.014320] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 13.014668] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.015007] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.015469] [ 13.015469] -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.015910] perf_event_init_cpu+0x5a/0x90 [ 13.016291] perf_event_init+0x1b2/0x1de [ 13.016654] start_kernel+0x2b8/0x42a [ 13.016995] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 13.017382] [ 13.017382] -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: [ 13.017794] perf_event_init_cpu+0x21/0x90 [ 13.018172] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb3/0x960 [ 13.018573] _cpu_up+0xa7/0x140 [ 13.018871] do_cpu_up+0xa4/0xc0 [ 13.019178] smp_init+0xcd/0xd2 [ 13.019483] kernel_init_freeable+0x123/0x24f [ 13.019878] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 13.020201] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 13.020541] [ 13.020541] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 13.021051] static_key_slow_inc+0xe/0x20 [ 13.021424] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x28c/0x300 [ 13.021891] perf_trace_event_init+0x11f/0x250 [ 13.022297] perf_trace_init+0x6b/0xa0 [ 13.022644] perf_tp_event_init+0x25/0x40 [ 13.023011] perf_try_init_event+0x6b/0x90 [ 13.023386] perf_event_alloc+0x9a8/0xc40 [ 13.023754] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0x1dd/0xd30 [ 13.024173] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.024519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.024968] [ 13.024968] -> #0 (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.025434] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.025764] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.026215] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.026584] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.027042] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.027389] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.027727] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.028171] [ 13.028171] other info that might help us debug this: [ 13.028171] [ 13.028807] Chain exists of: [ 13.028807] tracepoints_mutex --> &cpuctx_mutex --> bpf_event_mutex [ 13.028807] [ 13.029666] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 13.029666] [ 13.030140] CPU0 CPU1 [ 13.030510] ---- ---- [ 13.030875] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.031166] lock(&cpuctx_mutex); [ 13.031645] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.032135] lock(tracepoints_mutex); [ 13.032441] [ 13.032441] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 13.032441] [ 13.032911] 1 lock held by test_progs/246: [ 13.033239] #0: 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.033909] [ 13.033909] stack backtrace: [ 13.034258] CPU: 1 PID: 246 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422-dirty #477 [ 13.034964] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 13.035657] Call Trace: [ 13.035859] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 13.036130] print_circular_bug.isra.37+0x1ce/0x1db [ 13.036526] __lock_acquire+0x1158/0x1350 [ 13.036852] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037154] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037447] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.037876] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.038167] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.038600] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.039028] ? __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.039337] ? __mutex_lock+0x24a/0x970 [ 13.039649] ? bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.039992] ? __bpf_trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi+0x10/0x10 [ 13.040478] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.040906] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.041325] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.041649] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.042068] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 [ 13.042374] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.042678] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.042975] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.043382] RIP: 0033:0x7f23b10a07f9 [ 13.045155] RSP: 002b:00007ffdef42fdd8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 13.045759] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffdef42ff70 RCX: 00007f23b10a07f9 [ 13.046326] RDX: 0000000000000070 RSI: 00007ffdef42fe10 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 13.046893] RBP: 00007ffdef42fdf0 R08: 0000000000000038 R09: 00007ffdef42fe10 [ 13.047462] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 13.048029] R13: 0000000000000016 R14: 00007f23b1db4690 R15: 0000000000000000 Since tracepoints_mutex will be taken in tracepoint_probe_register/unregister() there is no need to take bpf_event_mutex too. bpf_event_mutex is protecting modifications to prog array used in kprobe/perf bpf progs. bpf_raw_tracepoints don't need to take this mutex. Fixes: c4f6699dfcb8 ("bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 8b068adb9da1..f1a86a0d881d 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1204,22 +1204,12 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog * int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) { - int err; - - mutex_lock(&bpf_event_mutex); - err = __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog); - mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex); - return err; + return __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog); } int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) { - int err; - - mutex_lock(&bpf_event_mutex); - err = tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog); - mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex); - return err; + return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog); } int bpf_get_perf_event_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *prog_id, -- cgit v1.2.1 From 7c4cd051add3d00bbff008a133c936c515eaa8fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin KaFai Lau Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:12:45 -0800 Subject: bpf: Fix syscall's stackmap lookup potential deadlock The map_lookup_elem used to not acquiring spinlock in order to optimize the reader. It was true until commit 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") The syscall's map_lookup_elem(stackmap) calls bpf_stackmap_copy(). bpf_stackmap_copy() may find the elem no longer needed after the copy is done. If that is the case, pcpu_freelist_push() saves this elem for reuse later. This push requires a spinlock. If a tracing bpf_prog got run in the middle of the syscall's map_lookup_elem(stackmap) and this tracing bpf_prog is calling bpf_get_stackid(stackmap) which also requires the same pcpu_freelist's spinlock, it may end up with a dead lock situation as reported by Eric Dumazet in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1030266/ The situation is the same as the syscall's map_update_elem() which needs to acquire the pcpu_freelist's spinlock and could race with tracing bpf_prog. Hence, this patch fixes it by protecting bpf_stackmap_copy() with this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active) to prevent tracing bpf_prog from running. A later syscall's map_lookup_elem commit f1a2e44a3aec ("bpf: add queue and stack maps") also acquires a spinlock and races with tracing bpf_prog similarly. Hence, this patch is forward looking and protects the majority of the map lookups. bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem() is the exception since it is for network bpf_prog only (i.e. never called by tracing bpf_prog). Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index b155cd17c1bd..8577bb7f8be6 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -713,8 +713,13 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) if (bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map)) { err = bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem(map, key, value); - } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH || - map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) { + goto done; + } + + preempt_disable(); + this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active); + if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH || + map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) { err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value); } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) { err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value); @@ -744,7 +749,10 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) } rcu_read_unlock(); } + this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active); + preempt_enable(); +done: if (err) goto free_value; -- cgit v1.2.1