From 32240a913d9f3a5aad42175d7696590ea1bfdb08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Schmidt Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:33:38 -0500 Subject: btrfs: mirror_num should be int, not u64 My previous patch introduced some u64 for failed_mirror variables, this one makes it consistent again. Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_io.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h index feb9be0e23bc..7604c3001322 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct extent_io_ops { unsigned long bio_flags); int (*readpage_io_hook)(struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end); int (*readpage_io_failed_hook)(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, - u64 start, u64 end, u64 failed_mirror, + u64 start, u64 end, int failed_mirror, struct extent_state *state); int (*writepage_io_failed_hook)(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end, -- cgit v1.2.1