From d2e12e66a939c54ed84e5f1b6947f0c45f6c56eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Gerlach Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:41:28 -0500 Subject: remoteproc: Fix potential race condition in rproc_add rproc_add adds the newly created remoteproc to a list for use by rproc_get_by_phandle and then does some additional processing to finish adding the remoteproc. This leaves a small window of time in which the rproc is available in the list but not yet fully initialized, so if another driver comes along and gets a handle to the rproc, it will be invalid. Rearrange the code in rproc_add to make sure the rproc is added to the list only after it has been successfuly initialized. Fixes: fec47d863587 ("remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c') diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index db3958b3f094..fe0539ed9cb5 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1264,11 +1264,6 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc) if (ret < 0) return ret; - /* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */ - mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); - list_add(&rproc->node, &rproc_list); - mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex); - dev_info(dev, "%s is available\n", rproc->name); dev_info(dev, "Note: remoteproc is still under development and considered experimental.\n"); @@ -1276,8 +1271,16 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc) /* create debugfs entries */ rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc); + ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; - return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); + /* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */ + mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); + list_add(&rproc->node, &rproc_list); + mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex); + + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_add); -- cgit v1.2.1