From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c index 77a365f573d7..c69e2772658d 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void __iomem *clksrc_dbx500_timer_base; -static cycle_t notrace clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 notrace clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_read(struct clocksource *cs) { void __iomem *base = clksrc_dbx500_timer_base; u32 count, count2; -- cgit v1.2.1