From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c index 456316f6c868..092ea664d2c6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ void apbt_setup_secondary_clock(void) {} static int apbt_clocksource_register(void) { u64 start, now; - cycle_t t1; + u64 t1; /* Start the counter, use timer 2 as source, timer 0/1 for event */ dw_apb_clocksource_start(clocksource_apbt); @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ unsigned long apbt_quick_calibrate(void) { int i, scale; u64 old, new; - cycle_t t1, t2; + u64 t1, t2; unsigned long khz = 0; u32 loop, shift; -- cgit v1.2.3