From 415cb800375cc4e89fb5a6a454e484bd4adbffb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:10:16 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Allow smaller allocations during large writes The ocfs2 write code loops through a page much like the block code, except that ocfs2 allocation units can be any size, including larger than page size. Typically it's equal to or larger than page size - most kernels run 4k pages, the minimum ocfs2 allocation (cluster) size. Some changes introduced during 2.6.23 changed the way writes to pages are handled, and inadvertantly broke support for > 4k page size. Instead of just writing one cluster at a time, we now handle the whole page in one pass. This means that multiple (small) seperate allocations might happen in the same pass. The allocation code howver typically optimizes by getting the maximum which was reserved. This triggered a BUG_ON in the extend code where it'd ask for a single bit (for one part of a > 4k page) and get back more than it asked for. Fix this by providing a variant of the high level allocation function which allows the caller to specify a maximum. The traditional function remains and just calls the new one with a maximum determined from the initial reservation. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 4 ++-- fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c | 4 +--- fs/ocfs2/localalloc.h | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h | 11 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c index 7e34e66159c6..f3bc3658e7a5 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ int ocfs2_do_extend_allocation(struct ocfs2_super *osb, goto leave; } - status = ocfs2_claim_clusters(osb, handle, data_ac, 1, - &bit_off, &num_bits); + status = __ocfs2_claim_clusters(osb, handle, data_ac, 1, + clusters_to_add, &bit_off, &num_bits); if (status < 0) { if (status != -ENOSPC) mlog_errno(status); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c index 545f7892cdf3..de984d272576 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c @@ -524,13 +524,12 @@ bail: int ocfs2_claim_local_alloc_bits(struct ocfs2_super *osb, handle_t *handle, struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, - u32 min_bits, + u32 bits_wanted, u32 *bit_off, u32 *num_bits) { int status, start; struct inode *local_alloc_inode; - u32 bits_wanted; void *bitmap; struct ocfs2_dinode *alloc; struct ocfs2_local_alloc *la; @@ -538,7 +537,6 @@ int ocfs2_claim_local_alloc_bits(struct ocfs2_super *osb, mlog_entry_void(); BUG_ON(ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_LOCAL); - bits_wanted = ac->ac_bits_wanted - ac->ac_bits_given; local_alloc_inode = ac->ac_inode; alloc = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) osb->local_alloc_bh->b_data; la = OCFS2_LOCAL_ALLOC(alloc); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.h b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.h index 385a10152f9c..3f76631e110c 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.h @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int ocfs2_claim_local_alloc_bits(struct ocfs2_super *osb, handle_t *handle, struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, - u32 min_bits, + u32 bits_wanted, u32 *bit_off, u32 *num_bits); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c index d9c5c9fcb30f..8f09f5235e3a 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c @@ -1486,21 +1486,21 @@ static inline void ocfs2_block_to_cluster_group(struct inode *inode, * contig. allocation, set to '1' to indicate we can deal with extents * of any size. */ -int ocfs2_claim_clusters(struct ocfs2_super *osb, - handle_t *handle, - struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, - u32 min_clusters, - u32 *cluster_start, - u32 *num_clusters) +int __ocfs2_claim_clusters(struct ocfs2_super *osb, + handle_t *handle, + struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, + u32 min_clusters, + u32 max_clusters, + u32 *cluster_start, + u32 *num_clusters) { int status; - unsigned int bits_wanted = ac->ac_bits_wanted - ac->ac_bits_given; + unsigned int bits_wanted = max_clusters; u64 bg_blkno = 0; u16 bg_bit_off; mlog_entry_void(); - BUG_ON(!ac); BUG_ON(ac->ac_bits_given >= ac->ac_bits_wanted); BUG_ON(ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_LOCAL @@ -1557,6 +1557,19 @@ bail: return status; } +int ocfs2_claim_clusters(struct ocfs2_super *osb, + handle_t *handle, + struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, + u32 min_clusters, + u32 *cluster_start, + u32 *num_clusters) +{ + unsigned int bits_wanted = ac->ac_bits_wanted - ac->ac_bits_given; + + return __ocfs2_claim_clusters(osb, handle, ac, min_clusters, + bits_wanted, cluster_start, num_clusters); +} + static inline int ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits(handle_t *handle, struct inode *alloc_inode, struct ocfs2_group_desc *bg, diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h index f212dc01a84b..cafe93703095 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h @@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ int ocfs2_claim_clusters(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u32 min_clusters, u32 *cluster_start, u32 *num_clusters); +/* + * Use this variant of ocfs2_claim_clusters to specify a maxiumum + * number of clusters smaller than the allocation reserved. + */ +int __ocfs2_claim_clusters(struct ocfs2_super *osb, + handle_t *handle, + struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, + u32 min_clusters, + u32 max_clusters, + u32 *cluster_start, + u32 *num_clusters); int ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits(handle_t *handle, struct inode *alloc_inode, -- cgit v1.2.1 From db56246c6980e376b02d2da568d119da71f82fb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:06:29 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Fix pos/len passed to ocfs2_write_cluster This was broken for file systems whose cluster size is greater than page size. Pos needs to be incremented as we loop through the descriptors, and len needs to be capped to the size of a single cluster. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index 50cd8a209012..fa43810e5970 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -1211,18 +1211,33 @@ static int ocfs2_write_cluster_by_desc(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t pos, unsigned len) { int ret, i; + loff_t cluster_off; + unsigned int local_len = len; struct ocfs2_write_cluster_desc *desc; + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(mapping->host->i_sb); for (i = 0; i < wc->w_clen; i++) { desc = &wc->w_desc[i]; + /* + * We have to make sure that the total write passed in + * doesn't extend past a single cluster. + */ + local_len = len; + cluster_off = pos & (osb->s_clustersize - 1); + if ((cluster_off + local_len) > osb->s_clustersize) + local_len = osb->s_clustersize - cluster_off; + ret = ocfs2_write_cluster(mapping, desc->c_phys, desc->c_unwritten, data_ac, meta_ac, - wc, desc->c_cpos, pos, len); + wc, desc->c_cpos, pos, local_len); if (ret) { mlog_errno(ret); goto out; } + + len -= local_len; + pos += local_len; } ret = 0; -- cgit v1.2.1 From 5c26a7b70f89c36e8d9acc95cb896c3cd205fc8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:49:29 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Don't double set write parameters The target page offsets were being incorrectly set a second time in ocfs2_prepare_page_for_write(), which was causing problems on a 16k page size kernel. Additionally, ocfs2_write_failure() was incorrectly using those parameters instead of the parameters for the individual page being cleaned up. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 16 +++------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index fa43810e5970..f37f25c931f5 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -930,18 +930,11 @@ static void ocfs2_write_failure(struct inode *inode, loff_t user_pos, unsigned user_len) { int i; - unsigned from, to; + unsigned from = user_pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1), + to = user_pos + user_len; struct page *tmppage; - ocfs2_zero_new_buffers(wc->w_target_page, user_pos, user_len); - - if (wc->w_large_pages) { - from = wc->w_target_from; - to = wc->w_target_to; - } else { - from = 0; - to = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; - } + ocfs2_zero_new_buffers(wc->w_target_page, from, to); for(i = 0; i < wc->w_num_pages; i++) { tmppage = wc->w_pages[i]; @@ -991,9 +984,6 @@ static int ocfs2_prepare_page_for_write(struct inode *inode, u64 *p_blkno, map_from = cluster_start; map_to = cluster_end; } - - wc->w_target_from = map_from; - wc->w_target_to = map_to; } else { /* * If we haven't allocated the new page yet, we -- cgit v1.2.1 From 813d974c53a2b353566a86bb127625b403696dae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunil Mushran Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:59:48 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Pack vote message and response structures The ocfs2_vote_msg and ocfs2_response_msg structs needed to be packed to ensure similar sizeofs in 32-bit and 64-bit arches. Without this, we had inadvertantly broken 32/64 bit cross mounts. Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/vote.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/vote.c b/fs/ocfs2/vote.c index 66a13ee63d4c..c05358538f2b 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/vote.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/vote.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct ocfs2_vote_msg { struct ocfs2_msg_hdr v_hdr; __be32 v_reserved1; -}; +} __attribute__ ((packed)); /* Responses are given these values to maintain backwards * compatibility with older ocfs2 versions */ @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct ocfs2_response_msg { struct ocfs2_msg_hdr r_hdr; __be32 r_response; -}; +} __attribute__ ((packed)); struct ocfs2_vote_work { struct list_head w_list; -- cgit v1.2.1