summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* intel-iommu: Export a flag indicating that the IOMMU is used for iGFX.David Woodhouse2011-10-141-10/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | We really don't want this to work in the general case; device drivers *shouldn't* care whether they are behind an IOMMU or not. But the integrated graphics is a special case, because the IOMMU and the GTT are all kind of smashed into one and generally horrifically buggy, so it's reasonable for the graphics driver to want to know when the IOMMU is active for the graphics hardware. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
* intel-iommu: Workaround IOTLB hang on Ironlake GPUDavid Woodhouse2011-10-141-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | To work around a hardware issue, we have to submit IOTLB flushes while the graphics engine is idle. The graphics driver will (we hope) go to great lengths to ensure that it gets that right on the affected chipset(s)... so let's not screw it over by deferring the unmap and doing it later. That wouldn't be very helpful. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
* intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep reportRoland Dreier2011-10-101-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When unbinding a device so that I could pass it through to a KVM VM, I got the lockdep report below. It looks like a legitimate lock ordering problem: - domain_context_mapping_one() takes iommu->lock and calls iommu_support_dev_iotlb(), which takes device_domain_lock (inside iommu->lock). - domain_remove_one_dev_info() starts by taking device_domain_lock then takes iommu->lock inside it (near the end of the function). So this is the classic AB-BA deadlock. It looks like a safe fix is to simply release device_domain_lock a bit earlier, since as far as I can tell, it doesn't protect any of the stuff accessed at the end of domain_remove_one_dev_info() anyway. BTW, the use of device_domain_lock looks a bit unsafe to me... it's at least not obvious to me why we aren't vulnerable to the race below: iommu_support_dev_iotlb() domain_remove_dev_info() lock device_domain_lock find info unlock device_domain_lock lock device_domain_lock find same info unlock device_domain_lock free_devinfo_mem(info) do stuff with info after it's free However I don't understand the locking here well enough to know if this is a real problem, let alone what the best fix is. Anyway here's the full lockdep output that prompted all of this: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.39.1+ #1 ------------------------------------------------------- bash/13954 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 but task is already holding lock: (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (device_domain_lock){-.-...}: [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f8350>] domain_context_mapping_one+0x600/0x750 [<ffffffff812f84df>] domain_context_mapping+0x3f/0x120 [<ffffffff812f9175>] iommu_prepare_identity_map+0x1c5/0x1e0 [<ffffffff81ccf1ca>] intel_iommu_init+0x88e/0xb5e [<ffffffff81cab204>] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x41 [<ffffffff81002165>] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x190 [<ffffffff81ca3d3f>] kernel_init+0xe3/0x168 [<ffffffff8157ac24>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 -> #0 (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}: [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10 [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90 [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0 [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0 [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50 [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0 [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30 [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170 [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190 [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0 [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b other info that might help us debug this: 6 locks held by bash/13954: #0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e4464>] sysfs_write_file+0x44/0x170 #1: (s_active#3){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e44ed>] sysfs_write_file+0xcd/0x170 #2: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81372edb>] driver_unbind+0x9b/0xc0 #3: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81373cc7>] device_release_driver+0x27/0x50 #4: (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108974f>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xb0 #5: (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230 stack backtrace: Pid: 13954, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.39.1+ #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff810993a7>] print_circular_bug+0xf7/0x100 [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10 [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff8109d57d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180 [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90 [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0 [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0 [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50 [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0 [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30 [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170 [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190 [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0 [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
* x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/Ohad Ben-Cohen2011-06-211-0/+4016
This should ease finding similarities with different platforms, with the intention of solving problems once in a generic framework which everyone can use. Note: to move intel-iommu.c, the declaration of pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge() has to move from drivers/pci/pci.h to include/linux/pci.h. This is handled in this patch, too. As suggested, also drop DMAR's EXPERIMENTAL tag while we're at it. Compile-tested on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud