diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/rtmutex.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 112 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 4b1015ef0dc7..00b49cdbb4e0 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -322,67 +322,16 @@ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); } -/* - * Must hold both p->pi_lock and task_rq(p)->lock. - */ -void rt_mutex_update_top_task(struct task_struct *p) -{ - if (!task_has_pi_waiters(p)) { - p->pi_top_task = NULL; - return; - } - - p->pi_top_task = task_top_pi_waiter(p)->task; -} - -/* - * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority - * - * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when - * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting - */ -int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task) -{ - if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task))) - return task->normal_prio; - - return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->prio, - task->normal_prio); -} - -/* - * Must hold either p->pi_lock or task_rq(p)->lock. - */ -struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task) -{ - return task->pi_top_task; -} - -/* - * Called by sched_setscheduler() to get the priority which will be - * effective after the change. - */ -int rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio) +static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p) { - struct task_struct *top_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(task); + struct task_struct *pi_task = NULL; - if (!top_task) - return newprio; + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); - return min(top_task->prio, newprio); -} + if (task_has_pi_waiters(p)) + pi_task = task_top_pi_waiter(p)->task; -/* - * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified. - * - * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held. - */ -static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task) -{ - int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task); - - if (task->prio != prio || dl_prio(prio)) - rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio); + rt_mutex_setprio(p, pi_task); } /* @@ -742,7 +691,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) { /* @@ -758,7 +707,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter); waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); } else { /* * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority @@ -966,7 +915,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, return -EDEADLK; raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); waiter->task = task; waiter->lock = lock; waiter->prio = task->prio; @@ -988,7 +937,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); if (owner->pi_blocked_on) chain_walk = 1; } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) { @@ -1040,13 +989,14 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); /* - * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a - * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the - * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing - * lock->wait_lock. + * Remove it from current->pi_waiters and deboost. + * + * We must in fact deboost here in order to ensure we call + * rt_mutex_setprio() to update p->pi_top_task before the + * task unblocks. */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); /* * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays @@ -1058,9 +1008,19 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, */ lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; - raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); - + /* + * We deboosted before waking the top waiter task such that we don't + * run two tasks with the 'same' priority (and ensure the + * p->pi_top_task pointer points to a blocked task). This however can + * lead to priority inversion if we would get preempted after the + * deboost but before waking our donor task, hence the preempt_disable() + * before unlock. + * + * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_postunlock(); + */ + preempt_disable(); wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); + raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); } /* @@ -1095,7 +1055,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); @@ -1134,8 +1094,7 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; - if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio && - !dl_prio(task->prio))) { + if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio && !dl_prio(task->prio))) { raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); return; } @@ -1389,17 +1348,6 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, * Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock. */ mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock); - - /* - * We should deboost before waking the top waiter task such that - * we don't run two tasks with the 'same' priority. This however - * can lead to prio-inversion if we would get preempted after - * the deboost but before waking our high-prio task, hence the - * preempt_disable before unlock. Pairs with preempt_enable() in - * rt_mutex_postunlock(); - */ - preempt_disable(); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); return true; /* call rt_mutex_postunlock() */ |
